Naomi Wallace | AR (USA)
|
|||
Rating
897
(Peak: 1485)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
322-302-2 (0.516)
Career earnings: $538
|
Avg. score
358-353
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 94% (588 of 626)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 5% (32 of 588)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
11/2007 | 897 | 1716 | 21 | TWL | |
10/2007 | 897 | 1717 | 20 | TWL | |
9/2007 | 897 | 1728 | 20 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 897 | 1758 | 20 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 897 | 1746 | 21 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 931 | 1677 | 25 | TWL | |
5/2007 | 931 | 1806 | 36 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 931 | 1787 | 36 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 931 | 1800 | 36 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 931 | 1782 | 37 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 931 | 1780 | 37 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 931 | 1765 | 36 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 931 | 1790 | 37 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 931 | 1792 | 36 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 931 | 1819 | 36 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 931 | 1827 | 37 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 966 | 1730 | 40 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 966 | 1727 | 40 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 966 | 1718 | 40 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 966 | 1719 | 41 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1000 | 1662 | 44 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1000 | 1654 | 44 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1000 | 1659 | 44 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1067 | 1480 | 50 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1067 | 1496 | 50 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1067 | 1490 | 50 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1067 | 1524 | 50 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1067 | 1527 | 50 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1067 | 1530 | 50 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1067 | 1510 | 50 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1096 | 1434 | 52 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1065 | 1531 | 50 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1058 | 1551 | 48 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1058 | 1554 | 48 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1058 | 1549 | 48 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1111 | 1403 | 52 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1111 | 1408 | 51 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1099 | 1454 | 50 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1099 | 1404 | 52 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1099 | 1423 | 51 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1099 | 1418 | 51 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1099 | 1427 | 50 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1155 | 1275 | 55 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1141 | 1316 | 53 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1141 | 1335 | 54 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1141 | 1323 | 54 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1141 | 1333 | 54 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1197 | 1180 | 59 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1197 | 1181 | 59 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1218 | 1089 | 61 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1218 | 1132 | 60 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1218 | 1116 | 60 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1218 | 1114 | 61 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1218 | 1124 | 60 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1214 | 1123 | 58 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1214 | 1083 | 59 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1214 | 1087 | 59 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1214 | 1083 | 59 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1214 | 1067 | 58 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1214 | 1057 | 57 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1214 | 1058 | 57 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1214 | 1039 | 56 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1214 | 1047 | 57 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1214 | 1039 | 57 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1214 | 1041 | 57 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1214 | 1032 | 57 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1193 | 1069 | 55 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1193 | 1105 | 54 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1193 | 1100 | 54 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1193 | 1126 | 53 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1193 | 1119 | 54 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1168 | 1154 | 51 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1168 | 1153 | 53 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1168 | 1159 | 53 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1168 | 1136 | 51 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1251 | 974 | 58 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1225 | 1016 | 56 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1225 | 1022 | 56 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1225 | 1015 | 56 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1283 | 872 | 62 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1283 | 891 | 61 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1283 | 880 | 61 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1310 | 827 | 63 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1310 | 827 | 62 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1310 | 834 | 62 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1310 | 822 | 62 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1310 | 831 | 63 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1310 | 837 | 62 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 1291 | 984 | 56 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 1291 | 962 | 57 | TWL | |
2/1999 | 1291 | 933 | 56 | TWL |