Joe Dackman | Reno, NV (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1911
(Peak: 1942)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
341-206-0 (0.623)
Career earnings: $8,497
|
Avg. score
426-387
|
renew NASPA membership |
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (547 of 547)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 74% (405 of 547)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
9/2012 | 1911 | 39 | 97 | TWL | |
8/2012 | 1911 | 43 | 97 | TWL | |
7/2012 | 1911 | 42 | 97 | TWL | |
6/2012 | 1911 | 42 | 97 | TWL | |
5/2012 | 1911 | 42 | 97 | TWL | |
4/2012 | 1911 | 37 | 97 | TWL | |
3/2012 | 1911 | 39 | 97 | TWL | |
2/2012 | 1911 | 36 | 98 | TWL | |
1/2012 | 1911 | 37 | 98 | TWL | |
12/2011 | 1911 | 38 | 97 | TWL | |
11/2011 | 1911 | 37 | 98 | TWL | |
10/2011 | 1911 | 37 | 98 | TWL | |
9/2011 | 1911 | 40 | 97 | TWL | |
8/2011 | 1911 | 34 | 98 | TWL | |
7/2011 | 1911 | 33 | 98 | TWL | |
6/2011 | 1911 | 30 | 98 | TWL | |
5/2011 | 1911 | 32 | 98 | TWL | |
4/2011 | 1911 | 31 | 98 | TWL | |
3/2011 | 1911 | 32 | 98 | TWL | |
2/2011 | 1911 | 31 | 98 | TWL | |
1/2011 | 1911 | 29 | 98 | TWL | |
12/2010 | 1911 | 28 | 98 | TWL | |
11/2010 | 1911 | 29 | 98 | TWL | |
10/2010 | 1936 | 21 | 98 | TWL | |
9/2010 | 1886 | 42 | 97 | TWL | |
8/2010 | 1886 | 37 | 98 | TWL | |
7/2010 | 1874 | 44 | 97 | TWL | |
6/2010 | 1856 | 54 | 97 | TWL | |
5/2010 | 1856 | 56 | 97 | TWL | |
4/2010 | 1835 | 73 | 96 | TWL | |
3/2010 | 1835 | 65 | 96 | TWL | |
2/2010 | 1858 | 50 | 97 | TWL | |
1/2010 | 1840 | 58 | 97 | TWL | |
12/2009 | 1840 | 58 | 97 | TWL | |
11/2009 | 1840 | 57 | 97 | TWL | |
10/2009 | 1848 | 51 | 97 | TWL | |
9/2009 | 1914 | 18 | 99 | TWL | |
8/2009 | 1914 | 16 | 99 | TWL | |
7/2009 | 1913 | 14 | 99 | TWL | |
6/2009 | 1913 | 12 | 99 | TWL | |
5/2009 | 1892 | 19 | 99 | TWL | |
4/2009 | 1892 | 18 | 99 | TWL | |
3/2009 | 1892 | 18 | 99 | TWL | |
2/2009 | 1892 | 14 | 99 | TWL | |
1/2009 | 1827 | 46 | 97 | TWL | |
12/2008 | 1902 | 11 | 99 | TWL | |
11/2008 | 1902 | 11 | 99 | TWL | |
10/2008 | 1902 | 13 | 99 | TWL | |
9/2008 | 1902 | 13 | 99 | TWL | |
8/2008 | 1902 | 14 | 99 | TWL | |
7/2008 | 1902 | 10 | 99 | TWL | |
6/2008 | 1902 | 11 | 99 | TWL | |
5/2008 | 1833 | 38 | 98 | TWL | |
4/2008 | 1833 | 45 | 97 | TWL | |
3/2008 | 1833 | 43 | 98 | TWL | |
2/2008 | 1833 | 46 | 97 | TWL | |
1/2008 | 1793 | 88 | 95 | TWL | |
12/2007 | 1793 | 87 | 96 | TWL | |
11/2007 | 1815 | 66 | 96 | TWL | |
10/2007 | 1836 | 44 | 97 | TWL | |
9/2007 | 1836 | 47 | 97 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 1836 | 51 | 97 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 1788 | 94 | 95 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 1709 | 202 | 91 | TWL | |
5/2007 | 1709 | 194 | 93 | TWL | |
4/2007 | 1709 | 198 | 91 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 1709 | 203 | 92 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 1709 | 203 | 92 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 1685 | 227 | 91 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 1685 | 229 | 91 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 1685 | 240 | 91 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 1685 | 240 | 91 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 1695 | 230 | 91 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 1614 | 343 | 88 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 1616 | 337 | 88 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 1582 | 398 | 86 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1543 | 447 | 84 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1417 | 676 | 76 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1417 | 678 | 76 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1363 | 809 | 72 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1285 | 961 | 67 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1285 | 964 | 67 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1294 | 949 | 67 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1241 | 1066 | 65 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1241 | 1065 | 64 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1091 | 1464 | 52 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1091 | 1450 | 52 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1091 | 1440 | 52 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1091 | 1452 | 52 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1091 | 1447 | 52 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1091 | 1450 | 52 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1091 | 1455 | 51 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1091 | 1449 | 50 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1091 | 1462 | 49 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1091 | 1475 | 49 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1091 | 1427 | 51 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1091 | 1446 | 50 | TWL |