Bill G Eastham | Albuquerque, NM (USA)
|
|||
Rating
721
(Peak: 761)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
106-172-0 (0.381)
Career earnings: $0
|
Avg. score
322-338
|
renew NASPA membership |
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 90% (250 of 278)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 60% (150 of 250)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
5/2011 | 721 | 1808 | 9 | TWL | |
4/2011 | 721 | 1802 | 9 | TWL | |
3/2011 | 721 | 1806 | 9 | TWL | |
2/2011 | 721 | 1834 | 9 | TWL | |
1/2011 | 721 | 1839 | 9 | TWL | |
12/2010 | 721 | 1851 | 8 | TWL | |
9/2010 | 649 | 1959 | 5 | TWL | |
8/2010 | 649 | 1937 | 5 | TWL | |
7/2010 | 649 | 2013 | 5 | TWL | |
6/2010 | 649 | 2011 | 5 | TWL | |
5/2010 | 649 | 2022 | 5 | TWL | |
4/2010 | 649 | 2031 | 5 | TWL | |
3/2010 | 649 | 2029 | 5 | TWL | |
2/2010 | 649 | 2038 | 5 | TWL | |
1/2010 | 649 | 2046 | 5 | TWL | |
12/2009 | 649 | 2041 | 5 | TWL | |
11/2009 | 649 | 2052 | 5 | TWL | |
10/2009 | 649 | 2070 | 5 | TWL | |
9/2009 | 642 | 2061 | 4 | TWL | |
8/2009 | 642 | 2070 | 4 | TWL | |
7/2009 | 642 | 2063 | 4 | TWL | |
6/2009 | 642 | 2069 | 4 | TWL | |
11/2008 | 643 | 2125 | 3 | TWL | |
10/2008 | 643 | 2092 | 4 | TWL | |
9/2008 | 602 | 2142 | 2 | TWL | |
8/2008 | 602 | 2195 | 2 | TWL | |
7/2008 | 602 | 2119 | 2 | TWL | |
6/2008 | 602 | 2124 | 2 | TWL | |
5/2008 | 602 | 2119 | 2 | TWL | |
4/2008 | 602 | 2129 | 2 | TWL | |
3/2008 | 602 | 2123 | 2 | TWL | |
2/2008 | 602 | 2133 | 2 | TWL | |
1/2008 | 602 | 2128 | 2 | TWL | |
12/2007 | 602 | 2134 | 2 | TWL | |
11/2007 | 602 | 2109 | 2 | TWL | |
10/2007 | 602 | 2111 | 2 | TWL | |
9/2007 | 592 | 2124 | 2 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 592 | 2166 | 2 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 592 | 2161 | 2 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 592 | 2182 | 3 | TWL | |
5/2007 | 592 | 2626 | 7 | TWL | |
4/2007 | 592 | 2622 | 0 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 592 | 2574 | 8 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 592 | 2595 | 8 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 592 | 2588 | 8 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 592 | 2585 | 8 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 668 | 2462 | 11 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 668 | 2506 | 12 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 668 | 2498 | 11 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 714 | 2432 | 15 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 714 | 2445 | 15 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 714 | 2450 | 15 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 696 | 2482 | 14 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 696 | 2496 | 13 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 696 | 2499 | 14 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 696 | 2560 | 14 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 696 | 2541 | 14 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 696 | 2547 | 14 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 708 | 2549 | 14 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 708 | 2554 | 16 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 669 | 2621 | 13 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 667 | 2671 | 13 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 667 | 2675 | 13 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 667 | 2672 | 12 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 650 | 2676 | 11 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 650 | 2680 | 11 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 650 | 2712 | 11 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 650 | 2687 | 11 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 650 | 2680 | 11 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 650 | 2658 | 11 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 650 | 2608 | 11 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 650 | 2598 | 10 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 647 | 2632 | 10 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 711 | 2380 | 14 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 711 | 2434 | 14 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 711 | 2427 | 14 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 711 | 2437 | 14 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 711 | 2458 | 14 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 711 | 2462 | 14 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 711 | 2450 | 14 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 711 | 2413 | 14 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 711 | 2387 | 14 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 711 | 2355 | 14 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 711 | 2357 | 14 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 711 | 2313 | 14 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 728 | 2328 | 14 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 728 | 2275 | 15 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 728 | 2278 | 14 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 728 | 2260 | 15 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 728 | 2197 | 15 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 728 | 2155 | 14 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 728 | 2127 | 14 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 728 | 2050 | 14 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 728 | 2084 | 14 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 761 | 2039 | 17 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 761 | 2019 | 17 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 761 | 2006 | 17 | TWL |