Fee Hughes | MD (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1292
(Peak: 1630)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
178-178-4 (0.500)
Career earnings: $750
|
Avg. score
376-385
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 101% (362 of 360)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 29% (105 of 362)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
2/2009 | 1284 | 907 | 58 | TWL | |
7/2010 | 1292 | 897 | 57 | TWL | |
5/2010 | 1292 | 896 | 58 | TWL | |
5/2009 | 1292 | 893 | 58 | TWL | |
4/2010 | 1292 | 889 | 58 | TWL | |
7/2009 | 1292 | 888 | 59 | TWL | |
6/2010 | 1292 | 888 | 58 | TWL | |
3/2009 | 1292 | 887 | 59 | TWL | |
4/2009 | 1292 | 887 | 58 | TWL | |
6/2009 | 1292 | 886 | 59 | TWL | |
1/2010 | 1292 | 884 | 59 | TWL | |
8/2009 | 1292 | 884 | 59 | TWL | |
3/2010 | 1292 | 883 | 58 | TWL | |
2/2010 | 1292 | 881 | 59 | TWL | |
9/2009 | 1292 | 880 | 59 | TWL | |
12/2009 | 1292 | 878 | 59 | TWL | |
11/2009 | 1292 | 878 | 59 | TWL | |
10/2009 | 1292 | 875 | 59 | TWL | |
9/2010 | 1292 | 856 | 58 | TWL | |
8/2010 | 1292 | 855 | 58 | TWL | |
10/2010 | 1292 | 855 | 58 | TWL | |
11/2010 | 1292 | 849 | 58 | TWL | |
1/2009 | 1328 | 822 | 62 | TWL | |
12/2008 | 1328 | 820 | 62 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 1372 | 747 | 66 | TWL | |
12/2007 | 1372 | 734 | 66 | TWL | |
9/2007 | 1372 | 734 | 66 | TWL | |
1/2008 | 1372 | 733 | 66 | TWL | |
10/2007 | 1372 | 732 | 66 | TWL | |
11/2007 | 1372 | 731 | 66 | TWL | |
5/2007 | 1388 | 727 | 74 | TWL | |
4/2007 | 1388 | 722 | 69 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 1388 | 719 | 74 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 1388 | 718 | 74 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 1388 | 711 | 68 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 1388 | 710 | 74 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 1388 | 709 | 75 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 1388 | 707 | 68 | TWL | |
8/2008 | 1407 | 680 | 69 | TWL | |
11/2008 | 1407 | 680 | 69 | TWL | |
9/2008 | 1407 | 670 | 69 | TWL | |
10/2008 | 1407 | 668 | 69 | TWL | |
6/2008 | 1407 | 666 | 69 | TWL | |
5/2008 | 1407 | 663 | 69 | TWL | |
7/2008 | 1407 | 659 | 69 | TWL | |
2/2008 | 1407 | 654 | 70 | TWL | |
4/2008 | 1407 | 651 | 70 | TWL | |
3/2008 | 1407 | 646 | 70 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 1462 | 578 | 79 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 1462 | 569 | 79 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 1462 | 568 | 80 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 1462 | 565 | 79 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1497 | 540 | 81 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1497 | 530 | 81 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1502 | 530 | 81 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1502 | 528 | 82 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1502 | 528 | 82 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1497 | 527 | 81 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1511 | 526 | 82 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1511 | 523 | 83 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1502 | 522 | 81 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1502 | 522 | 81 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1502 | 521 | 82 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1497 | 521 | 81 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 1497 | 519 | 82 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1502 | 519 | 82 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1502 | 519 | 82 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1511 | 517 | 83 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 1497 | 516 | 82 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1502 | 515 | 83 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1511 | 511 | 83 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1511 | 510 | 82 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1502 | 509 | 82 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1502 | 509 | 82 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1511 | 509 | 82 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1511 | 507 | 83 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1511 | 507 | 83 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1511 | 506 | 83 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1511 | 504 | 83 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1511 | 504 | 83 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1502 | 499 | 82 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1548 | 457 | 84 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1548 | 454 | 84 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1548 | 454 | 84 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1548 | 453 | 84 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1548 | 453 | 84 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1548 | 452 | 84 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1548 | 441 | 84 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1548 | 440 | 84 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1548 | 438 | 85 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1548 | 435 | 84 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1548 | 434 | 84 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1548 | 424 | 84 | TWL |