Andre Ornish | San Diego, CA (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1303
(Peak: 1386)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
162-139-1 (0.538)
Career earnings: $384
|
Avg. score
375-370
|
renew NASPA membership |
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (302 of 302)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 52% (158 of 302)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
1/2001 | 739 | 2013 | 14 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 739 | 2010 | 14 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 772 | 2029 | 17 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 772 | 2044 | 17 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 787 | 1968 | 17 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 846 | 1909 | 23 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 846 | 1931 | 23 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 846 | 1853 | 22 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 846 | 1880 | 23 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 846 | 1877 | 23 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 846 | 1859 | 23 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 846 | 1814 | 23 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 846 | 1857 | 23 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 846 | 1842 | 23 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 846 | 1886 | 22 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 846 | 1884 | 22 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 846 | 1851 | 23 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 893 | 1934 | 29 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 893 | 1902 | 29 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 893 | 1941 | 29 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 903 | 1904 | 30 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 903 | 1922 | 30 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 954 | 1813 | 37 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 954 | 1781 | 36 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 954 | 1828 | 35 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 954 | 1823 | 36 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 954 | 1818 | 36 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 955 | 1786 | 36 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 955 | 1818 | 36 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 955 | 1813 | 37 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 955 | 1811 | 36 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1021 | 1644 | 43 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1021 | 1657 | 43 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1021 | 1636 | 43 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1021 | 1637 | 43 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1021 | 1599 | 43 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1021 | 1613 | 44 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1021 | 1611 | 44 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1021 | 1604 | 44 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1021 | 1612 | 45 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1021 | 1598 | 45 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1044 | 1591 | 47 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1044 | 1588 | 46 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1069 | 1506 | 48 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1069 | 1519 | 48 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1069 | 1509 | 48 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1147 | 1297 | 57 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1215 | 1156 | 62 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1215 | 1142 | 62 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1215 | 1152 | 61 | TWL | |
10/2007 | 1313 | 844 | 61 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 1313 | 871 | 69 | TWL | |
9/2007 | 1313 | 843 | 61 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 1313 | 859 | 61 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 1313 | 863 | 61 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 1313 | 872 | 61 | TWL | |
5/2007 | 1313 | 880 | 69 | TWL | |
4/2007 | 1313 | 878 | 63 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 1313 | 870 | 69 | TWL | |
8/2008 | 1313 | 881 | 61 | TWL | |
11/2007 | 1313 | 851 | 60 | TWL | |
12/2007 | 1313 | 855 | 61 | TWL | |
1/2008 | 1313 | 852 | 61 | TWL | |
2/2008 | 1313 | 853 | 61 | TWL | |
3/2008 | 1313 | 841 | 61 | TWL | |
4/2008 | 1313 | 850 | 61 | TWL | |
5/2008 | 1313 | 841 | 61 | TWL | |
6/2008 | 1313 | 845 | 61 | TWL | |
7/2008 | 1313 | 845 | 61 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 1313 | 864 | 69 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 1313 | 865 | 69 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 1313 | 873 | 69 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 1313 | 876 | 69 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 1313 | 863 | 69 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1318 | 924 | 69 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1332 | 895 | 71 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1332 | 891 | 71 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 1386 | 731 | 74 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 1386 | 736 | 74 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1386 | 744 | 74 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1386 | 755 | 73 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1386 | 751 | 74 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1386 | 767 | 74 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1386 | 761 | 74 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1386 | 761 | 74 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1386 | 754 | 74 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1386 | 756 | 75 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1386 | 758 | 75 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 1386 | 731 | 74 | TWL |