Shahid Malik | Burlington, NJ (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1549
(Peak: 1717)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
486-507-5 (0.489)
Career earnings: $1,625
|
Avg. score
372-381
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (998 of 998)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 40% (402 of 998)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
7/2010 | 1549 | 403 | 81 | TWL | |
6/2010 | 1549 | 402 | 81 | TWL | |
5/2010 | 1549 | 404 | 81 | TWL | |
4/2010 | 1549 | 408 | 81 | TWL | |
3/2010 | 1549 | 408 | 81 | TWL | |
2/2010 | 1549 | 411 | 80 | TWL | |
1/2010 | 1549 | 412 | 80 | TWL | |
12/2009 | 1549 | 415 | 80 | TWL | |
11/2009 | 1549 | 417 | 80 | TWL | |
10/2009 | 1549 | 416 | 80 | TWL | |
9/2009 | 1549 | 413 | 80 | TWL | |
8/2009 | 1549 | 412 | 81 | TWL | |
7/2009 | 1549 | 415 | 80 | TWL | |
6/2009 | 1549 | 411 | 81 | TWL | |
5/2009 | 1549 | 407 | 81 | TWL | |
4/2009 | 1549 | 408 | 81 | TWL | |
3/2009 | 1549 | 410 | 81 | TWL | |
2/2009 | 1549 | 406 | 81 | TWL | |
1/2009 | 1549 | 405 | 81 | TWL | |
12/2008 | 1549 | 409 | 81 | TWL | |
11/2008 | 1549 | 418 | 81 | TWL | |
10/2008 | 1549 | 401 | 81 | TWL | |
9/2008 | 1501 | 480 | 78 | TWL | |
8/2008 | 1535 | 445 | 80 | TWL | |
7/2008 | 1533 | 433 | 80 | TWL | |
6/2008 | 1554 | 394 | 81 | TWL | |
5/2008 | 1536 | 424 | 80 | TWL | |
4/2008 | 1571 | 367 | 83 | TWL | |
3/2008 | 1547 | 403 | 81 | TWL | |
2/2008 | 1549 | 396 | 81 | TWL | |
1/2008 | 1549 | 402 | 81 | TWL | |
12/2007 | 1531 | 440 | 79 | TWL | |
11/2007 | 1596 | 351 | 83 | TWL | |
10/2007 | 1599 | 339 | 84 | TWL | |
9/2007 | 1599 | 343 | 84 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 1603 | 344 | 84 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 1592 | 352 | 84 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 1592 | 355 | 84 | TWL | |
5/2007 | 1562 | 392 | 86 | TWL | |
4/2007 | 1588 | 359 | 84 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 1657 | 267 | 90 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 1650 | 279 | 90 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 1647 | 282 | 90 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 1641 | 292 | 89 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 1654 | 278 | 90 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 1647 | 285 | 89 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 1623 | 315 | 88 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 1655 | 289 | 89 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 1717 | 202 | 93 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 1697 | 236 | 91 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1599 | 367 | 87 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1597 | 373 | 87 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1597 | 374 | 87 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1616 | 355 | 88 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1622 | 348 | 88 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1607 | 358 | 88 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1557 | 438 | 85 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1485 | 552 | 81 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1485 | 552 | 81 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1475 | 607 | 80 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1452 | 640 | 79 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1481 | 582 | 81 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1481 | 568 | 81 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1457 | 612 | 79 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1444 | 646 | 79 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1452 | 625 | 79 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1452 | 629 | 79 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1462 | 604 | 79 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1496 | 547 | 81 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1530 | 481 | 83 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1530 | 483 | 83 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1580 | 385 | 86 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1574 | 399 | 86 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1588 | 380 | 86 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1513 | 498 | 82 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1569 | 411 | 85 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1592 | 371 | 86 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1546 | 444 | 84 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1546 | 438 | 84 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1504 | 527 | 81 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1521 | 496 | 82 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1538 | 453 | 84 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1538 | 437 | 84 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1488 | 557 | 80 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1521 | 484 | 82 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1525 | 487 | 82 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1525 | 492 | 82 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1432 | 653 | 77 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1437 | 646 | 77 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1419 | 676 | 76 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1423 | 670 | 75 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1423 | 675 | 75 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1435 | 651 | 76 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1430 | 652 | 75 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1427 | 671 | 75 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1421 | 664 | 75 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1421 | 671 | 74 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1322 | 867 | 67 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1323 | 854 | 67 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1268 | 940 | 62 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1297 | 883 | 64 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1167 | 1138 | 52 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1167 | 1150 | 52 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1167 | 1139 | 53 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1167 | 1131 | 53 | TWL |