Mary Lee Couey | Abilene, TX (USA)
(Deceased)
|
|||
Rating
1333
(Peak: 1716)
|
Ranking
---
|
Lifetime record
741-863-7 (0.462)
Career earnings: $990
|
Avg. score
359-364
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 87% (1405 of 1611)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 17% (233 of 1405)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
11/1981 | 1523 | 99 | 4 | TWL | |
2/1999 | 1396 | 735 | 66 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 1396 | 766 | 65 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 1367 | 829 | 63 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 1391 | 720 | 69 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 1391 | 713 | 68 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 1391 | 713 | 68 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 1306 | 865 | 62 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 1306 | 846 | 63 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 1306 | 848 | 63 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1306 | 858 | 62 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1337 | 787 | 65 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1337 | 785 | 65 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1337 | 775 | 64 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1345 | 762 | 65 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1345 | 762 | 65 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1301 | 846 | 62 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1301 | 844 | 63 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1463 | 556 | 75 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1463 | 541 | 76 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1352 | 788 | 66 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1352 | 797 | 66 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1352 | 789 | 66 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1352 | 783 | 66 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1337 | 812 | 65 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1297 | 902 | 63 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1244 | 1002 | 59 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1272 | 952 | 60 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1272 | 947 | 61 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1272 | 950 | 60 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1348 | 789 | 67 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1348 | 788 | 67 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1348 | 762 | 67 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1348 | 781 | 67 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1348 | 774 | 68 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1379 | 719 | 70 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1397 | 689 | 71 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1334 | 811 | 66 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1334 | 818 | 67 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1321 | 843 | 66 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1321 | 858 | 66 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1321 | 869 | 67 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1315 | 878 | 67 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1315 | 864 | 67 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1315 | 895 | 67 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1315 | 878 | 67 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1315 | 895 | 67 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1364 | 790 | 71 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1364 | 799 | 71 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1364 | 800 | 71 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1364 | 801 | 72 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1313 | 910 | 68 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1313 | 893 | 69 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1313 | 902 | 68 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1352 | 812 | 71 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1352 | 821 | 71 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1352 | 788 | 71 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1352 | 813 | 71 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1352 | 822 | 71 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1352 | 819 | 71 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1352 | 814 | 71 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1352 | 822 | 71 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1352 | 811 | 71 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1352 | 823 | 71 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1352 | 818 | 71 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1352 | 815 | 71 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1317 | 894 | 69 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1317 | 887 | 69 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1317 | 934 | 68 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1317 | 925 | 68 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1317 | 919 | 68 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1317 | 929 | 68 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1317 | 927 | 69 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1317 | 919 | 69 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1333 | 888 | 71 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1333 | 878 | 71 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1333 | 882 | 70 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1333 | 888 | 71 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1333 | 890 | 71 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1333 | 894 | 71 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1333 | 868 | 71 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1333 | 856 | 71 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1333 | 850 | 71 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1333 | 859 | 71 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1333 | 861 | 71 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1333 | 870 | 70 | TWL |