Eric Chaikin | Woodland Hills, CA (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1687
(Peak: 1759)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
196-211-2 (0.482)
Career earnings: $281
|
Avg. score
382-391
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (409 of 409)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 24% (98 of 409)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
2/1999 | 1476 | 577 | 73 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 1502 | 550 | 75 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 1502 | 559 | 75 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 1502 | 522 | 78 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 1502 | 514 | 77 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 1502 | 514 | 77 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 1502 | 528 | 77 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 1581 | 383 | 83 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 1581 | 391 | 83 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1581 | 390 | 83 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1581 | 381 | 83 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1590 | 374 | 83 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1590 | 373 | 83 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1618 | 330 | 85 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1618 | 328 | 85 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1610 | 345 | 84 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1610 | 344 | 84 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1610 | 340 | 85 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1667 | 261 | 88 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1693 | 244 | 89 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1693 | 248 | 89 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1701 | 229 | 90 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1701 | 231 | 90 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1650 | 312 | 86 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1650 | 312 | 87 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1650 | 309 | 87 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1650 | 312 | 86 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1645 | 314 | 87 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1639 | 323 | 86 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1639 | 318 | 86 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1691 | 254 | 89 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1724 | 193 | 91 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1755 | 158 | 93 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1755 | 155 | 93 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1687 | 252 | 89 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1687 | 251 | 89 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1687 | 245 | 89 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1675 | 269 | 89 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1675 | 271 | 89 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1675 | 267 | 89 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1675 | 268 | 89 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1759 | 160 | 94 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1759 | 162 | 93 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1759 | 171 | 93 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1759 | 166 | 93 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1759 | 175 | 93 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1715 | 226 | 91 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1715 | 231 | 91 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1715 | 231 | 91 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1715 | 235 | 91 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1715 | 235 | 91 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1715 | 231 | 91 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1715 | 228 | 92 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1715 | 231 | 91 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1715 | 229 | 91 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1715 | 218 | 92 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1715 | 217 | 92 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1715 | 217 | 92 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1669 | 294 | 90 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1669 | 292 | 89 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1669 | 288 | 90 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1669 | 290 | 90 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1669 | 285 | 90 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1669 | 280 | 90 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1669 | 288 | 90 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1669 | 283 | 90 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1669 | 289 | 90 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1669 | 291 | 90 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1648 | 328 | 89 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1648 | 328 | 89 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1678 | 272 | 91 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1678 | 273 | 91 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1678 | 269 | 90 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1678 | 268 | 91 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1678 | 274 | 90 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1678 | 270 | 90 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1678 | 268 | 90 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1678 | 262 | 90 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1678 | 264 | 90 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 1678 | 256 | 91 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 1678 | 253 | 91 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 1678 | 252 | 91 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 1678 | 246 | 89 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 1678 | 245 | 88 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 1678 | 244 | 89 | TWL |