Sarah Auker | OR
|
|||
Rating
667
(Peak: 861)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
![]() |
Lifetime record
41-84-0 (0.328)
Career earnings: $0
|
Avg. score
340-369
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (125 of 125)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 38% (47 of 125)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
2/1999 | 696 | 2012 | 6 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 696 | 2089 | 6 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 696 | 2110 | 6 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 696 | 2104 | 12 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 696 | 2043 | 11 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 696 | 2042 | 11 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 696 | 2057 | 11 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 696 | 2028 | 11 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 861 | 1775 | 23 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 861 | 1775 | 23 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 861 | 1756 | 22 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 861 | 1754 | 22 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 861 | 1719 | 22 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 861 | 1748 | 21 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 830 | 1779 | 19 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 830 | 1818 | 20 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 830 | 1814 | 20 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 830 | 1843 | 20 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 830 | 1827 | 20 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 830 | 1874 | 20 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 830 | 1885 | 19 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 830 | 1885 | 19 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 830 | 1859 | 20 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 830 | 1863 | 21 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 830 | 1933 | 21 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 830 | 1915 | 21 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 788 | 2284 | 20 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 788 | 2288 | 20 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 788 | 2266 | 20 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 788 | 2248 | 20 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 788 | 2258 | 20 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 788 | 2211 | 20 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 788 | 2272 | 21 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 788 | 2297 | 21 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 788 | 2301 | 21 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 788 | 2281 | 20 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 788 | 2301 | 20 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 788 | 2248 | 20 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 768 | 2250 | 20 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 768 | 2216 | 20 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 768 | 2217 | 21 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 768 | 2218 | 21 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 768 | 2232 | 21 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 768 | 2211 | 21 | TWL | |
4/2007 | 768 | 2250 | 5 | TWL | |
5/2007 | 768 | 2261 | 20 | TWL | |
9/2007 | 667 | 2072 | 4 | TWL | |
10/2007 | 667 | 2060 | 5 | TWL | |
11/2007 | 667 | 2061 | 5 | TWL | |
12/2007 | 667 | 2079 | 5 | TWL | |
1/2008 | 667 | 2074 | 5 | TWL | |
2/2008 | 667 | 2076 | 5 | TWL | |
3/2008 | 667 | 2069 | 5 | TWL | |
4/2008 | 667 | 2078 | 5 | TWL | |
5/2008 | 667 | 2073 | 4 | TWL | |
6/2008 | 667 | 2077 | 4 | TWL | |
7/2008 | 667 | 2071 | 5 | TWL | |
8/2008 | 667 | 2144 | 5 | TWL | |
9/2008 | 667 | 2090 | 5 | TWL | |
10/2008 | 667 | 2069 | 5 | TWL | |
11/2008 | 667 | 2102 | 4 | TWL | |
12/2008 | 667 | 2069 | 4 | TWL | |
1/2009 | 667 | 2091 | 4 | TWL | |
2/2009 | 667 | 2074 | 5 | TWL | |
3/2009 | 667 | 2071 | 5 | TWL | |
4/2009 | 667 | 2052 | 5 | TWL | |
5/2009 | 667 | 2055 | 5 | TWL | |
6/2009 | 667 | 2050 | 5 | TWL | |
7/2009 | 667 | 2044 | 5 | TWL | |
8/2009 | 667 | 2047 | 5 | TWL |