Craig Atterbury | Santa Barbara, CA (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1639
(Peak: 1800)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
![]() |
Lifetime record
653-516-5 (0.558)
Career earnings: $4,010
|
Avg. score
374-353
|
renew NASPA membership |
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 94% (1108 of 1174)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 11% (121 of 1108)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
7/2000 | 1554 | 404 | 82 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1554 | 396 | 82 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 1617 | 349 | 85 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1621 | 344 | 87 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 1617 | 343 | 85 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 1617 | 343 | 85 | TWL | |
2/1999 | 1638 | 343 | 84 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1621 | 339 | 88 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1621 | 338 | 88 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1613 | 337 | 84 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1613 | 335 | 84 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1621 | 335 | 88 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1621 | 333 | 88 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1621 | 333 | 88 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1621 | 332 | 88 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1621 | 331 | 88 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1621 | 329 | 88 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1639 | 329 | 88 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1639 | 329 | 88 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1621 | 328 | 88 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1621 | 327 | 88 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1639 | 326 | 89 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1621 | 325 | 88 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1639 | 324 | 89 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1639 | 317 | 89 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1639 | 316 | 89 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 1672 | 312 | 86 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1639 | 312 | 89 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 1639 | 311 | 89 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 1639 | 309 | 89 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1652 | 308 | 86 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 1639 | 307 | 89 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 1672 | 306 | 86 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1652 | 303 | 87 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1652 | 303 | 87 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 1639 | 298 | 89 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 1639 | 296 | 89 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 1662 | 292 | 87 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1651 | 284 | 87 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1651 | 283 | 87 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1664 | 283 | 87 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1664 | 283 | 87 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1662 | 280 | 87 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 1662 | 279 | 87 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 1662 | 278 | 88 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1681 | 277 | 90 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1681 | 276 | 90 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1681 | 275 | 90 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1662 | 274 | 87 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1681 | 273 | 90 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1681 | 272 | 90 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1662 | 271 | 87 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1662 | 271 | 88 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1681 | 270 | 90 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1681 | 268 | 90 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1681 | 264 | 90 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1711 | 236 | 91 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1706 | 232 | 91 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1710 | 230 | 91 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1710 | 225 | 91 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1734 | 192 | 92 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1737 | 188 | 92 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1737 | 187 | 92 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1737 | 184 | 92 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1750 | 167 | 93 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1750 | 165 | 93 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1756 | 157 | 93 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1777 | 155 | 94 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1777 | 153 | 94 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1761 | 152 | 93 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1761 | 151 | 93 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1761 | 147 | 93 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1761 | 146 | 94 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1761 | 145 | 94 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1772 | 142 | 94 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1785 | 139 | 94 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1785 | 134 | 94 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1772 | 131 | 94 | TWL |