Alice Burnham | FL (USA)
|
|||
Rating
687
(Peak: 939)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
166-228-1 (0.422)
Career earnings: $200
|
Avg. score
---
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (395 of 395)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 0% (0 of 395)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
9/1999 | 830 | 1809 | 20 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 830 | 1828 | 20 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 830 | 1828 | 20 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 830 | 1839 | 20 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 747 | 1898 | 14 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 747 | 1936 | 14 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 747 | 1941 | 14 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 769 | 1969 | 16 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 747 | 1983 | 14 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 747 | 1984 | 14 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 761 | 2002 | 14 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 659 | 2009 | 9 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 734 | 2025 | 14 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 659 | 2028 | 9 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 659 | 2059 | 9 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 659 | 2063 | 10 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 659 | 2078 | 9 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 659 | 2090 | 9 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 702 | 2095 | 12 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 702 | 2102 | 13 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 659 | 2122 | 10 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 729 | 2124 | 14 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 702 | 2127 | 13 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 702 | 2128 | 13 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 659 | 2129 | 9 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 659 | 2139 | 9 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 729 | 2152 | 14 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 659 | 2154 | 10 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 659 | 2160 | 10 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 659 | 2168 | 10 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 692 | 2178 | 12 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 652 | 2184 | 8 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 729 | 2194 | 15 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 659 | 2204 | 9 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 780 | 2214 | 19 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 652 | 2217 | 9 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 652 | 2217 | 9 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 726 | 2267 | 14 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 726 | 2283 | 14 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 726 | 2284 | 14 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 726 | 2288 | 15 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 726 | 2330 | 15 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 726 | 2337 | 14 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 727 | 2353 | 15 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 728 | 2354 | 15 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 728 | 2394 | 15 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 728 | 2406 | 15 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 728 | 2407 | 15 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 733 | 2412 | 16 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 728 | 2418 | 16 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 728 | 2419 | 16 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 728 | 2427 | 15 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 728 | 2437 | 16 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 733 | 2442 | 16 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 677 | 2477 | 12 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 658 | 2515 | 11 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 687 | 2520 | 13 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 656 | 2551 | 11 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 687 | 2561 | 14 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 687 | 2565 | 14 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 711 | 2570 | 16 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 658 | 2575 | 11 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 687 | 2576 | 13 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 687 | 2582 | 15 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 687 | 2585 | 14 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 687 | 2585 | 14 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 687 | 2601 | 12 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 687 | 2603 | 14 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 674 | 2618 | 13 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 687 | 2620 | 14 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 687 | 2625 | 14 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 687 | 2627 | 14 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 654 | 2648 | 11 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 621 | 2668 | 9 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 654 | 2669 | 11 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 584 | 2678 | 7 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 584 | 2681 | 7 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 584 | 2698 | 6 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 584 | 2707 | 7 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 584 | 2708 | 6 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 584 | 2723 | 7 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 584 | 2737 | 7 | TWL |