Ruth Burns | Stuart, FL (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1219
(Peak: 1386)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
409-433-4 (0.486)
Career earnings: $890
|
Avg. score
352-364
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (846 of 846)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 7% (57 of 846)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
2/1999 | 984 | 1552 | 28 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 970 | 1632 | 27 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 970 | 1649 | 27 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 908 | 1706 | 28 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 918 | 1653 | 28 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 918 | 1653 | 28 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 918 | 1662 | 28 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 918 | 1631 | 28 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 1069 | 1321 | 42 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1069 | 1327 | 42 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1066 | 1302 | 42 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1113 | 1209 | 46 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1113 | 1187 | 46 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1034 | 1374 | 38 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1170 | 1087 | 50 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1170 | 1091 | 52 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1170 | 1082 | 52 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1069 | 1323 | 42 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1069 | 1305 | 43 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1069 | 1347 | 42 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1069 | 1360 | 42 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1056 | 1383 | 41 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1137 | 1200 | 48 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1146 | 1191 | 49 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1128 | 1255 | 49 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1203 | 1098 | 55 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1203 | 1090 | 54 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1203 | 1098 | 54 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1203 | 1100 | 54 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1203 | 1074 | 55 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1203 | 1079 | 55 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1203 | 1047 | 56 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1203 | 1051 | 56 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1168 | 1130 | 53 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1226 | 1011 | 58 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1226 | 1011 | 58 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1226 | 1008 | 58 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1250 | 975 | 60 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1320 | 845 | 66 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1320 | 861 | 66 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1323 | 866 | 67 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1323 | 868 | 67 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1299 | 896 | 66 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1299 | 928 | 66 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1299 | 911 | 66 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1237 | 1065 | 61 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1204 | 1153 | 57 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1278 | 974 | 64 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1248 | 1048 | 62 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1299 | 941 | 67 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1299 | 942 | 67 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1299 | 919 | 68 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1302 | 923 | 67 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1302 | 926 | 67 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1257 | 1034 | 63 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1257 | 992 | 64 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1302 | 928 | 67 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1302 | 935 | 67 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1281 | 981 | 66 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1281 | 975 | 66 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1248 | 1057 | 63 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1248 | 1040 | 63 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1248 | 1050 | 63 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1248 | 1035 | 64 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1209 | 1135 | 60 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1209 | 1146 | 60 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1209 | 1121 | 61 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1209 | 1150 | 60 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1209 | 1147 | 60 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1298 | 951 | 67 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1254 | 1057 | 64 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1245 | 1076 | 64 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1276 | 999 | 67 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1386 | 774 | 74 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1325 | 895 | 70 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1325 | 899 | 70 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1309 | 942 | 69 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1309 | 939 | 69 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1309 | 939 | 69 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1220 | 1123 | 63 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1219 | 1123 | 63 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1219 | 1117 | 62 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1219 | 1107 | 62 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1219 | 1111 | 62 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1219 | 1113 | 62 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1219 | 1098 | 62 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1219 | 1098 | 62 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1219 | 1090 | 62 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 1219 | 1099 | 62 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 1219 | 1092 | 62 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 1219 | 1091 | 62 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 1219 | 1061 | 53 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 1219 | 1056 | 52 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 1219 | 1061 | 52 | TWL |