Ed Skalazub | Courtenay, BC (CAN)
|
|||
Rating
1168
(Peak: 1339)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
321-303-3 (0.514)
Career earnings: $1,183
|
Avg. score
349-376
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 98% (613 of 627)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 8% (49 of 613)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
7/2001 | 1223 | 1017 | 57 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1223 | 1020 | 56 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1250 | 1021 | 62 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1223 | 1022 | 56 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1250 | 1026 | 62 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1223 | 1027 | 56 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1223 | 1032 | 56 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1223 | 1034 | 56 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1223 | 1037 | 57 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1250 | 1037 | 62 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1239 | 1039 | 62 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1223 | 1041 | 57 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1223 | 1041 | 57 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1223 | 1042 | 57 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1239 | 1069 | 62 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1239 | 1069 | 62 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1239 | 1071 | 62 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1239 | 1071 | 62 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1232 | 1072 | 62 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1239 | 1073 | 62 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1239 | 1075 | 62 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1239 | 1079 | 62 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1232 | 1080 | 62 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1239 | 1085 | 61 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1232 | 1087 | 62 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 1176 | 1090 | 52 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1232 | 1090 | 62 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 1176 | 1092 | 52 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1232 | 1096 | 62 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1220 | 1098 | 61 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1220 | 1098 | 62 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1176 | 1100 | 52 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 1176 | 1101 | 52 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 1176 | 1101 | 52 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1220 | 1104 | 61 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 1176 | 1111 | 52 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1220 | 1113 | 61 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 1176 | 1114 | 53 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1178 | 1114 | 52 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1220 | 1121 | 61 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1220 | 1123 | 61 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1220 | 1123 | 61 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1220 | 1124 | 61 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1207 | 1129 | 61 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1220 | 1133 | 62 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1161 | 1135 | 52 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1220 | 1135 | 62 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1207 | 1136 | 61 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1220 | 1137 | 61 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1220 | 1137 | 63 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1207 | 1138 | 61 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1207 | 1138 | 61 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1161 | 1142 | 52 | TWL | |
9/2008 | 1168 | 1143 | 48 | TWL | |
10/2008 | 1168 | 1145 | 47 | TWL | |
6/2008 | 1168 | 1147 | 47 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1207 | 1149 | 61 | TWL | |
7/2008 | 1168 | 1149 | 47 | TWL | |
5/2008 | 1168 | 1150 | 47 | TWL | |
3/2008 | 1168 | 1151 | 47 | TWL | |
4/2008 | 1168 | 1152 | 47 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1207 | 1157 | 61 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1207 | 1157 | 62 | TWL | |
10/2007 | 1168 | 1157 | 46 | TWL | |
2/2008 | 1168 | 1157 | 47 | TWL | |
9/2007 | 1168 | 1158 | 46 | TWL | |
1/2008 | 1168 | 1158 | 47 | TWL | |
11/2007 | 1168 | 1161 | 46 | TWL | |
2/1999 | 1176 | 1162 | 46 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1207 | 1163 | 61 | TWL | |
12/2007 | 1168 | 1163 | 46 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1161 | 1167 | 51 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 1168 | 1169 | 58 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1207 | 1170 | 61 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 1168 | 1173 | 48 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 1168 | 1176 | 47 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1207 | 1178 | 61 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 1168 | 1180 | 58 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 1168 | 1180 | 46 | TWL | |
8/2008 | 1168 | 1180 | 47 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1207 | 1184 | 61 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 1168 | 1184 | 58 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1207 | 1191 | 61 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 1168 | 1195 | 57 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 1176 | 1201 | 46 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 1168 | 1205 | 57 | TWL | |
4/2007 | 1168 | 1218 | 48 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1121 | 1219 | 50 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 1176 | 1220 | 46 | TWL | |
5/2007 | 1168 | 1221 | 57 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1121 | 1236 | 49 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1121 | 1242 | 48 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1121 | 1244 | 49 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1121 | 1270 | 48 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1120 | 1278 | 49 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1120 | 1290 | 50 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1120 | 1314 | 50 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1120 | 1319 | 50 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1120 | 1324 | 50 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1120 | 1340 | 50 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1120 | 1364 | 50 | TWL |