Bob Fancett | Vancouver, BC (CAN)
|
|||
Rating
1610
(Peak: 1885)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
![]() |
Lifetime record
492-492-6 (0.500)
Career earnings: $563
|
Avg. score
369-372
|
renew NASPA membership |
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 95% (937 of 990)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 22% (203 of 937)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
3/2004 | 1785 | 128 | 95 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1785 | 128 | 95 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1785 | 129 | 95 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1785 | 129 | 95 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1785 | 136 | 95 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1785 | 142 | 95 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1785 | 134 | 95 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1785 | 135 | 95 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1750 | 190 | 93 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1750 | 191 | 93 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1750 | 183 | 93 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1750 | 183 | 93 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1750 | 189 | 93 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1743 | 166 | 92 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1743 | 167 | 92 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1743 | 170 | 92 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1743 | 171 | 92 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1743 | 174 | 92 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1743 | 172 | 92 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1743 | 170 | 92 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1743 | 166 | 92 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1742 | 178 | 92 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1742 | 175 | 92 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1742 | 181 | 92 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1742 | 182 | 92 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1742 | 174 | 92 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 1741 | 180 | 92 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 1741 | 190 | 91 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 1741 | 180 | 92 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1741 | 183 | 92 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1734 | 178 | 92 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1734 | 177 | 92 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1734 | 181 | 92 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1734 | 188 | 92 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1734 | 183 | 92 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 1733 | 232 | 89 | TWL | |
2/1999 | 1733 | 228 | 89 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 1733 | 227 | 89 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 1733 | 205 | 91 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 1733 | 203 | 91 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 1733 | 203 | 91 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1722 | 206 | 92 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1722 | 213 | 92 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1722 | 209 | 92 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1722 | 212 | 92 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1722 | 208 | 92 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1722 | 214 | 92 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1722 | 213 | 92 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1722 | 224 | 92 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1722 | 222 | 92 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1722 | 222 | 92 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1722 | 206 | 92 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1722 | 212 | 92 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1716 | 221 | 92 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1716 | 219 | 92 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1716 | 222 | 92 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1716 | 222 | 92 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1716 | 210 | 92 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1716 | 205 | 92 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1716 | 210 | 92 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1716 | 212 | 92 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1716 | 212 | 92 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1716 | 228 | 92 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1716 | 228 | 92 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1716 | 227 | 92 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1715 | 219 | 91 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1715 | 226 | 91 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1715 | 229 | 91 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1715 | 223 | 91 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1715 | 226 | 91 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1713 | 225 | 92 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1713 | 228 | 92 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1713 | 235 | 91 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1713 | 237 | 91 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1699 | 235 | 89 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1699 | 245 | 90 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1699 | 243 | 89 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1699 | 240 | 90 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1699 | 239 | 90 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1699 | 241 | 90 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1680 | 264 | 90 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1680 | 261 | 89 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1680 | 256 | 90 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1680 | 259 | 90 | TWL | |
9/2013 | 1610 | 284 | 83 | TWL | |
10/2013 | 1610 | 273 | 84 | TWL | |
12/2013 | 1610 | 275 | 84 | TWL | |
1/2014 | 1610 | 275 | 84 | TWL | |
2/2014 | 1610 | 275 | 84 | TWL | |
3/2014 | 1610 | 275 | 84 | TWL | |
4/2014 | 1610 | 279 | 83 | TWL | |
5/2014 | 1610 | 272 | 83 | TWL | |
6/2014 | 1610 | 283 | 82 | TWL | |
7/2014 | 1610 | 276 | 83 | TWL | |
8/2014 | 1610 | 256 | 83 | TWL | |
11/2013 | 1610 | 274 | 84 | TWL |