Nathan Schmidt | MN (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1314
(Peak: 1500)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
180-139-2 (0.564)
Career earnings: $630
|
Avg. score
333-337
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 93% (300 of 321)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 16% (47 of 300)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
5/2000 | 1500 | 486 | 78 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1500 | 481 | 78 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1500 | 497 | 78 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1500 | 490 | 78 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1500 | 491 | 78 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1500 | 486 | 77 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1490 | 509 | 78 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1490 | 515 | 78 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1490 | 519 | 77 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1490 | 486 | 78 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1490 | 495 | 78 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1490 | 495 | 78 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1490 | 504 | 78 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1490 | 517 | 78 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1490 | 517 | 78 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1490 | 515 | 78 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1490 | 523 | 78 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1453 | 597 | 75 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1453 | 593 | 75 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1453 | 586 | 75 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1453 | 591 | 75 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1453 | 572 | 75 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1453 | 584 | 75 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1453 | 576 | 76 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1453 | 580 | 76 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1453 | 585 | 76 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1453 | 582 | 75 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1453 | 586 | 76 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1453 | 595 | 76 | TWL | |
2/1999 | 1421 | 690 | 68 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 1421 | 716 | 68 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 1421 | 672 | 71 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 1421 | 727 | 67 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1416 | 660 | 71 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 1416 | 662 | 71 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 1416 | 667 | 70 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 1416 | 684 | 70 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 1416 | 677 | 70 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 1416 | 677 | 70 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1406 | 715 | 75 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1406 | 713 | 75 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1406 | 702 | 75 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1406 | 706 | 74 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1406 | 705 | 74 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1406 | 707 | 74 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1406 | 699 | 74 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1406 | 681 | 74 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1406 | 692 | 74 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1406 | 688 | 74 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1406 | 681 | 73 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1406 | 707 | 74 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1381 | 761 | 73 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1381 | 753 | 73 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1381 | 727 | 73 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1381 | 764 | 73 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1381 | 751 | 73 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1381 | 758 | 73 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1381 | 756 | 73 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1340 | 843 | 71 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1340 | 837 | 70 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1340 | 848 | 70 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1340 | 836 | 70 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1340 | 846 | 70 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1339 | 839 | 71 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1339 | 864 | 71 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1339 | 875 | 71 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1339 | 871 | 71 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1339 | 880 | 70 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1339 | 881 | 70 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1339 | 867 | 70 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1339 | 874 | 70 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1339 | 846 | 71 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1339 | 838 | 71 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1339 | 841 | 70 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1339 | 874 | 70 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1314 | 905 | 68 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1314 | 905 | 69 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1314 | 913 | 69 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1314 | 899 | 69 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1314 | 899 | 69 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1314 | 898 | 69 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1314 | 896 | 70 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1314 | 908 | 70 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1314 | 932 | 69 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1314 | 930 | 69 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1314 | 934 | 69 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1314 | 928 | 69 | TWL |