Julie Lopez | Camarillo, CA (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1350
(Peak: 1386)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
231-232-2 (0.499)
Career earnings: $875
|
Avg. score
366-352
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (464 of 465)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 15% (68 of 464)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
5/2002 | 1206 | 1082 | 58 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1206 | 1072 | 57 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1228 | 1015 | 56 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1248 | 1002 | 62 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1248 | 1001 | 62 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1248 | 997 | 62 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 1289 | 989 | 56 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 1289 | 965 | 56 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1270 | 943 | 61 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1270 | 936 | 61 | TWL | |
2/1999 | 1289 | 936 | 56 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1270 | 934 | 61 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1270 | 927 | 61 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1270 | 927 | 61 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1270 | 923 | 61 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1302 | 897 | 63 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 1289 | 896 | 62 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1302 | 896 | 63 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1302 | 890 | 63 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 1289 | 889 | 61 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 1289 | 889 | 61 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1319 | 889 | 69 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1302 | 887 | 62 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1319 | 883 | 69 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1319 | 881 | 69 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 1300 | 880 | 62 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1302 | 877 | 62 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1302 | 873 | 62 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1302 | 867 | 63 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1302 | 866 | 62 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 1300 | 861 | 62 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1323 | 860 | 64 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 1302 | 857 | 63 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1350 | 856 | 70 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1350 | 855 | 71 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1350 | 854 | 71 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1350 | 853 | 72 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1350 | 850 | 72 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1350 | 849 | 71 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1350 | 848 | 72 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1350 | 847 | 72 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1350 | 845 | 72 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1350 | 845 | 70 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1350 | 844 | 72 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1323 | 843 | 65 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1323 | 842 | 65 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1350 | 836 | 72 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1343 | 834 | 69 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1343 | 821 | 69 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1323 | 811 | 65 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1361 | 810 | 72 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1361 | 805 | 72 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1361 | 800 | 72 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1361 | 799 | 72 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1361 | 799 | 72 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1361 | 798 | 72 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1347 | 795 | 66 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1361 | 794 | 71 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1361 | 794 | 72 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1337 | 787 | 65 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1337 | 785 | 65 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1337 | 780 | 65 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1337 | 775 | 64 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1361 | 771 | 72 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1347 | 769 | 66 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1386 | 756 | 73 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1386 | 754 | 72 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1347 | 753 | 67 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1386 | 752 | 73 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1386 | 752 | 72 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1386 | 751 | 73 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1386 | 750 | 73 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1386 | 749 | 73 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1386 | 747 | 72 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1386 | 744 | 74 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1386 | 744 | 73 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1386 | 693 | 69 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1386 | 693 | 69 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1386 | 687 | 68 | TWL |