Mark Budovitch | Scottsdale, AZ (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1337
(Peak: 1392)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
171-116-2 (0.595)
Career earnings: $1,245
|
Avg. score
381-354
|
renew NASPA membership |
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 101% (291 of 289)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 11% (31 of 291)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
11/1999 | 869 | 1755 | 24 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 869 | 1729 | 23 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 869 | 1733 | 23 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 869 | 1699 | 23 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1079 | 1281 | 42 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1079 | 1286 | 41 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1059 | 1328 | 41 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1059 | 1325 | 42 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1039 | 1394 | 39 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1053 | 1343 | 41 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1055 | 1387 | 40 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1056 | 1384 | 41 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1051 | 1392 | 40 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1045 | 1407 | 40 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1045 | 1413 | 40 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1045 | 1449 | 41 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1084 | 1349 | 45 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1084 | 1337 | 44 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1098 | 1314 | 46 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1298 | 908 | 62 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1298 | 890 | 63 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1298 | 884 | 63 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1298 | 852 | 64 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1298 | 870 | 64 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1298 | 863 | 64 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1276 | 916 | 62 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1260 | 948 | 61 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1260 | 939 | 60 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1355 | 778 | 68 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1355 | 770 | 69 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1390 | 720 | 72 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1390 | 727 | 72 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1390 | 735 | 72 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1390 | 721 | 73 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1390 | 747 | 72 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1390 | 739 | 72 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1392 | 738 | 73 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1392 | 742 | 72 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1392 | 742 | 73 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1392 | 737 | 73 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1351 | 827 | 71 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1351 | 820 | 71 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1351 | 810 | 71 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1351 | 814 | 71 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1351 | 814 | 71 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1351 | 823 | 71 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1351 | 791 | 71 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1351 | 816 | 71 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1351 | 826 | 71 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1351 | 822 | 71 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1351 | 816 | 71 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1351 | 824 | 71 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1347 | 825 | 71 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1337 | 881 | 70 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1337 | 874 | 69 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1337 | 878 | 70 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1337 | 887 | 70 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1337 | 887 | 70 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1337 | 878 | 71 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1337 | 881 | 71 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1337 | 871 | 71 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1337 | 876 | 71 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1337 | 885 | 71 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1337 | 884 | 71 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1337 | 886 | 71 | TWL |