Seth Wapnick | Massapequa, NY (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1307
(Peak: 1435)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
53-41-0 (0.564)
Career earnings: $180
|
Avg. score
358-393
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (94 of 94)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 31% (29 of 94)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
11/2000 | 1154 | 1173 | 50 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1154 | 1173 | 50 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1244 | 1028 | 61 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1244 | 1044 | 62 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1244 | 1051 | 61 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1244 | 1012 | 62 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1244 | 1015 | 62 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1244 | 1012 | 62 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1244 | 1003 | 61 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1244 | 991 | 60 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1244 | 993 | 59 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1244 | 969 | 59 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1244 | 973 | 60 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1244 | 975 | 60 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1246 | 980 | 58 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1269 | 963 | 60 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1269 | 943 | 60 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1269 | 958 | 59 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1269 | 962 | 61 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1269 | 952 | 60 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1299 | 851 | 64 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1299 | 882 | 63 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1299 | 889 | 63 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1299 | 861 | 64 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1299 | 907 | 62 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1299 | 869 | 64 | TWL | |
11/2009 | 1307 | 834 | 61 | TWL | |
10/2009 | 1307 | 840 | 61 | TWL | |
9/2009 | 1307 | 845 | 60 | TWL | |
8/2009 | 1307 | 846 | 61 | TWL | |
7/2009 | 1307 | 847 | 60 | TWL | |
6/2009 | 1307 | 846 | 60 | TWL | |
4/2009 | 1307 | 855 | 60 | TWL | |
5/2009 | 1307 | 859 | 60 | TWL | |
3/2009 | 1307 | 860 | 60 | TWL | |
2/2009 | 1307 | 859 | 60 | TWL | |
1/2009 | 1307 | 854 | 61 | TWL | |
1/2010 | 1307 | 845 | 61 | TWL | |
12/2009 | 1307 | 835 | 61 | TWL | |
2/2010 | 1307 | 843 | 61 | TWL | |
3/2010 | 1307 | 850 | 60 | TWL | |
4/2010 | 1307 | 854 | 60 | TWL | |
5/2010 | 1307 | 853 | 60 | TWL | |
6/2010 | 1307 | 849 | 60 | TWL | |
7/2010 | 1307 | 850 | 60 | TWL | |
8/2010 | 1307 | 815 | 60 | TWL | |
9/2010 | 1307 | 823 | 60 | TWL | |
10/2010 | 1307 | 825 | 60 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1345 | 833 | 69 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1345 | 835 | 71 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1345 | 832 | 71 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1345 | 805 | 71 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1345 | 838 | 70 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1345 | 826 | 70 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1345 | 830 | 70 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1345 | 824 | 71 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1345 | 830 | 71 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1345 | 836 | 70 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1345 | 840 | 70 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1345 | 840 | 69 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 1350 | 783 | 71 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 1350 | 781 | 72 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 1350 | 780 | 72 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 1350 | 784 | 72 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 1350 | 790 | 71 | TWL | |
5/2007 | 1350 | 797 | 72 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 1420 | 669 | 77 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1420 | 692 | 77 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1420 | 692 | 76 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1420 | 691 | 76 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1420 | 691 | 76 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1420 | 690 | 76 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1420 | 672 | 76 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1420 | 671 | 76 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1420 | 664 | 77 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 1420 | 655 | 76 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 1420 | 659 | 77 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 1420 | 662 | 77 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1435 | 676 | 77 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1435 | 655 | 77 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1435 | 661 | 77 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1435 | 663 | 77 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1435 | 660 | 78 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1435 | 655 | 78 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1435 | 663 | 78 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1435 | 656 | 78 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1435 | 663 | 78 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1435 | 692 | 77 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1435 | 684 | 77 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1435 | 672 | 77 | TWL |