Kim Jackson | Indianapolis, IN (USA)
|
|||
Rating
661
(New peak)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
64-104-1 (0.382)
Career earnings: $0
|
Avg. score
331-349
|
renew NASPA membership |
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (169 of 169)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 43% (73 of 169)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
3/2004 | 446 | 2818 | 0 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 446 | 2898 | 0 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 446 | 2872 | 0 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 446 | 2910 | 0 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 446 | 2897 | 0 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 446 | 2869 | 0 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 446 | 2782 | 0 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 446 | 2839 | 0 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 446 | 2827 | 0 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 446 | 2847 | 0 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 446 | 2868 | 0 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 446 | 2871 | 0 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 500 | 2204 | 3 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 500 | 2370 | 3 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 500 | 2277 | 3 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 500 | 2274 | 3 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 500 | 2266 | 3 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 500 | 2284 | 3 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 500 | 2391 | 3 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 500 | 2146 | 3 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 500 | 2270 | 3 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 500 | 2223 | 3 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 500 | 2231 | 3 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 500 | 2209 | 3 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 501 | 2577 | 3 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 501 | 2625 | 4 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 501 | 2587 | 4 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 501 | 2634 | 4 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 501 | 2633 | 4 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 501 | 2667 | 3 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 501 | 2711 | 3 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 501 | 2756 | 4 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 501 | 2574 | 3 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 501 | 2561 | 3 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 501 | 2490 | 3 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 531 | 2899 | 5 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 531 | 2887 | 5 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 531 | 2853 | 6 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 531 | 2889 | 6 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 531 | 2857 | 6 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 531 | 2848 | 6 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 531 | 2851 | 5 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 532 | 2628 | 6 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 537 | 2634 | 6 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 537 | 2658 | 6 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 537 | 2650 | 6 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 537 | 2645 | 6 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 562 | 2690 | 6 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 562 | 2645 | 6 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 562 | 2710 | 6 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 562 | 2708 | 6 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 562 | 2787 | 6 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 562 | 2720 | 6 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 562 | 2706 | 6 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 562 | 2684 | 7 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 565 | 2853 | 7 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 570 | 2644 | 7 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 583 | 2350 | 6 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 583 | 2760 | 7 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 583 | 2799 | 5 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 583 | 2799 | 8 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 583 | 2780 | 8 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 583 | 2251 | 7 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 583 | 2288 | 7 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 583 | 2284 | 6 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 583 | 2243 | 6 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 583 | 2317 | 6 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 583 | 2753 | 7 | TWL | |
8/2009 | 608 | 2096 | 3 | TWL | |
7/2009 | 608 | 2090 | 3 | TWL | |
9/2007 | 615 | 2112 | 3 | TWL | |
10/2007 | 615 | 2105 | 2 | TWL | |
11/2007 | 615 | 2104 | 3 | TWL | |
12/2007 | 615 | 2129 | 2 | TWL | |
1/2008 | 615 | 2123 | 3 | TWL | |
2/2008 | 615 | 2127 | 2 | TWL | |
3/2008 | 615 | 2116 | 2 | TWL | |
4/2008 | 615 | 2122 | 3 | TWL | |
5/2008 | 615 | 2114 | 3 | TWL | |
6/2008 | 615 | 2120 | 3 | TWL | |
7/2008 | 615 | 2114 | 3 | TWL | |
8/2008 | 615 | 2190 | 3 | TWL | |
9/2008 | 615 | 2137 | 3 | TWL | |
1/2009 | 618 | 2127 | 2 | TWL | |
4/2007 | 618 | 2587 | 0 | TWL | |
2/2009 | 618 | 2113 | 3 | TWL | |
3/2009 | 618 | 2110 | 3 | TWL | |
5/2007 | 618 | 2590 | 9 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 618 | 2168 | 4 | TWL | |
12/2008 | 618 | 2102 | 2 | TWL | |
11/2008 | 618 | 2142 | 3 | TWL | |
10/2008 | 618 | 2116 | 3 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 618 | 2153 | 3 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 618 | 2150 | 3 | TWL |