Megan O'Connell | Minneapolis, MN (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1169
(Peak: 1332)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
175-160-3 (0.522)
Career earnings: $850
|
Avg. score
373-374
|
renew NASPA membership |
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (339 of 338)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 55% (187 of 339)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
11/2004 | 850 | 2125 | 27 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 867 | 2041 | 29 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 867 | 2036 | 29 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 867 | 2041 | 29 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 870 | 2106 | 31 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 870 | 2093 | 31 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 870 | 2093 | 30 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 870 | 2085 | 30 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 879 | 2033 | 29 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 879 | 2043 | 29 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 879 | 1995 | 29 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 879 | 2055 | 29 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 891 | 1991 | 31 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 891 | 2015 | 31 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 891 | 1962 | 32 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 891 | 1979 | 32 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 955 | 1835 | 40 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 955 | 1792 | 41 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 955 | 1792 | 40 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 955 | 1833 | 40 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 965 | 1801 | 41 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 965 | 1775 | 41 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 965 | 1762 | 42 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1039 | 1558 | 47 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 1050 | 1507 | 48 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1081 | 1437 | 51 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1081 | 1434 | 51 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 1099 | 1327 | 52 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 1099 | 1338 | 53 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 1099 | 1374 | 52 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 1099 | 1371 | 52 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 1099 | 1342 | 52 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 1115 | 1302 | 54 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 1115 | 1296 | 54 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 1115 | 1309 | 53 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 1115 | 1311 | 53 | TWL | |
4/2007 | 1115 | 1340 | 43 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1116 | 1333 | 53 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1116 | 1338 | 54 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1116 | 1359 | 54 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1116 | 1330 | 54 | TWL | |
5/2011 | 1156 | 1084 | 45 | TWL | |
8/2010 | 1156 | 1128 | 44 | TWL | |
9/2010 | 1156 | 1142 | 44 | TWL | |
10/2010 | 1156 | 1143 | 44 | TWL | |
11/2010 | 1156 | 1129 | 44 | TWL | |
12/2010 | 1156 | 1111 | 45 | TWL | |
1/2011 | 1156 | 1108 | 45 | TWL | |
2/2011 | 1156 | 1104 | 45 | TWL | |
3/2011 | 1156 | 1078 | 45 | TWL | |
4/2011 | 1156 | 1076 | 45 | TWL | |
6/2011 | 1156 | 1074 | 45 | TWL | |
7/2011 | 1156 | 1076 | 45 | TWL | |
8/2011 | 1156 | 1068 | 45 | TWL | |
9/2011 | 1156 | 1047 | 45 | TWL | |
10/2011 | 1156 | 1053 | 45 | TWL | |
11/2011 | 1156 | 1028 | 45 | TWL | |
5/2007 | 1173 | 1206 | 57 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 1173 | 1165 | 48 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 1173 | 1167 | 47 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 1173 | 1168 | 47 | TWL | |
9/2007 | 1173 | 1140 | 47 | TWL | |
10/2007 | 1173 | 1137 | 47 | TWL | |
10/2008 | 1205 | 1054 | 51 | TWL | |
5/2008 | 1205 | 1070 | 50 | TWL | |
6/2008 | 1205 | 1068 | 51 | TWL | |
7/2008 | 1205 | 1067 | 51 | TWL | |
8/2008 | 1205 | 1093 | 51 | TWL | |
9/2008 | 1205 | 1064 | 51 | TWL | |
11/2007 | 1226 | 1028 | 52 | TWL | |
4/2008 | 1240 | 1006 | 54 | TWL | |
3/2008 | 1240 | 1008 | 53 | TWL | |
2/2008 | 1240 | 998 | 54 | TWL | |
1/2008 | 1240 | 995 | 54 | TWL | |
12/2007 | 1240 | 999 | 54 | TWL | |
2/2010 | 1249 | 962 | 55 | TWL | |
3/2010 | 1249 | 959 | 55 | TWL | |
4/2010 | 1249 | 967 | 55 | TWL | |
1/2010 | 1249 | 965 | 55 | TWL | |
12/2009 | 1249 | 966 | 55 | TWL | |
5/2010 | 1265 | 940 | 56 | TWL | |
6/2010 | 1265 | 933 | 56 | TWL | |
7/2010 | 1265 | 934 | 56 | TWL | |
4/2009 | 1271 | 939 | 56 | TWL | |
5/2009 | 1299 | 876 | 59 | TWL | |
8/2009 | 1299 | 865 | 60 | TWL | |
6/2009 | 1299 | 865 | 60 | TWL | |
7/2009 | 1299 | 869 | 59 | TWL | |
11/2009 | 1299 | 858 | 60 | TWL | |
10/2009 | 1299 | 861 | 60 | TWL | |
9/2009 | 1299 | 863 | 60 | TWL | |
3/2009 | 1301 | 869 | 60 | TWL | |
2/2009 | 1319 | 845 | 61 | TWL | |
1/2009 | 1319 | 836 | 61 | TWL | |
12/2008 | 1319 | 835 | 61 | TWL | |
11/2008 | 1332 | 824 | 62 | TWL |