Shirley Ritz | Las Vegas, NV (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1340
(Peak: 1646)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
733-724-7 (0.503)
Career earnings: $2,125
|
Avg. score
357-357
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 99% (1454 of 1464)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 4% (52 of 1454)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
10/1999 | 1622 | 330 | 85 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1611 | 339 | 84 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1603 | 357 | 84 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1603 | 354 | 84 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1587 | 383 | 83 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 1576 | 396 | 82 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 1575 | 397 | 83 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 1575 | 396 | 82 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 1575 | 396 | 82 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1567 | 421 | 85 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1556 | 420 | 82 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1554 | 396 | 82 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1554 | 404 | 82 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1548 | 424 | 81 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 1542 | 435 | 80 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1541 | 426 | 80 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1541 | 422 | 81 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1541 | 429 | 81 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1533 | 476 | 83 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1533 | 470 | 83 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1533 | 473 | 82 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1533 | 484 | 83 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1533 | 469 | 82 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1533 | 469 | 82 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1533 | 472 | 82 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 1530 | 498 | 77 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1502 | 504 | 79 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1495 | 507 | 78 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 1494 | 574 | 74 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1490 | 509 | 78 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1483 | 547 | 77 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1483 | 540 | 77 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1478 | 575 | 79 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1478 | 563 | 80 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1478 | 564 | 80 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1478 | 562 | 80 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1478 | 543 | 76 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1458 | 560 | 76 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1445 | 610 | 74 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1444 | 623 | 76 | TWL | |
2/1999 | 1444 | 643 | 70 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1444 | 620 | 76 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1444 | 621 | 76 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1444 | 594 | 75 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1444 | 613 | 76 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1444 | 612 | 75 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1444 | 604 | 75 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1444 | 597 | 75 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1444 | 598 | 75 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1440 | 590 | 75 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1435 | 643 | 77 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1435 | 636 | 78 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1435 | 651 | 77 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1435 | 632 | 78 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1435 | 620 | 78 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1435 | 641 | 77 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1435 | 637 | 78 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1435 | 632 | 78 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1435 | 636 | 78 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1435 | 631 | 78 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1435 | 622 | 77 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1435 | 631 | 78 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1428 | 647 | 73 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1424 | 623 | 74 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1402 | 683 | 71 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1389 | 717 | 70 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1386 | 711 | 70 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1372 | 803 | 73 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1372 | 804 | 73 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1372 | 793 | 73 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1372 | 792 | 73 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1372 | 790 | 73 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1372 | 798 | 73 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1372 | 796 | 73 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 1340 | 814 | 64 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 1340 | 829 | 71 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 1340 | 801 | 71 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 1340 | 807 | 71 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 1340 | 813 | 71 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 1340 | 829 | 71 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 1340 | 846 | 70 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1340 | 841 | 70 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1340 | 847 | 70 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1340 | 848 | 70 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1340 | 854 | 71 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1340 | 847 | 71 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1340 | 843 | 71 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1323 | 872 | 70 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1323 | 871 | 71 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1323 | 885 | 70 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1323 | 912 | 70 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1323 | 906 | 70 | TWL |