Jo Hatchell | Denham Springs, LA (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1046
(Peak: 1620)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
671-683-9 (0.496)
Career earnings: $940
|
Avg. score
347-363
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 83% (1133 of 1363)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 7% (79 of 1133)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
4/2006 | 1046 | 1512 | 47 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1046 | 1517 | 48 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1046 | 1538 | 48 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1046 | 1532 | 48 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1046 | 1537 | 48 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1046 | 1537 | 48 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1046 | 1552 | 49 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1046 | 1550 | 48 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1046 | 1588 | 48 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1046 | 1595 | 48 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1046 | 1598 | 47 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1046 | 1566 | 48 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1085 | 1457 | 52 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1085 | 1469 | 52 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1085 | 1468 | 51 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1121 | 1377 | 54 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1163 | 1275 | 57 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1174 | 1254 | 57 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1174 | 1244 | 57 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1058 | 1542 | 47 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1058 | 1500 | 48 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1058 | 1512 | 48 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1058 | 1502 | 48 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1058 | 1510 | 47 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1058 | 1517 | 47 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1058 | 1511 | 46 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1058 | 1535 | 47 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1073 | 1494 | 48 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1073 | 1511 | 48 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1073 | 1508 | 48 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1073 | 1487 | 48 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1059 | 1495 | 46 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1059 | 1544 | 45 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1059 | 1536 | 45 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1059 | 1544 | 46 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1058 | 1548 | 46 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1058 | 1538 | 46 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1058 | 1533 | 46 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1058 | 1523 | 46 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1058 | 1517 | 45 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1058 | 1511 | 44 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1033 | 1577 | 42 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 978 | 1702 | 36 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 978 | 1739 | 36 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 978 | 1696 | 36 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 978 | 1692 | 36 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 978 | 1673 | 37 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 939 | 1737 | 32 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 939 | 1701 | 32 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 974 | 1604 | 35 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 974 | 1571 | 34 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 974 | 1591 | 34 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1015 | 1480 | 39 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1015 | 1461 | 40 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1015 | 1459 | 39 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1036 | 1392 | 41 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1036 | 1427 | 41 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1036 | 1417 | 41 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1036 | 1454 | 40 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1104 | 1305 | 46 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1104 | 1299 | 45 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1104 | 1307 | 46 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1104 | 1311 | 47 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1097 | 1295 | 45 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1123 | 1234 | 47 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1123 | 1234 | 47 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1121 | 1247 | 47 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1157 | 1155 | 50 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1157 | 1107 | 51 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1157 | 1128 | 51 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1157 | 1110 | 51 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1148 | 1134 | 50 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1148 | 1119 | 49 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1128 | 1167 | 47 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1083 | 1250 | 43 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1083 | 1277 | 43 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1028 | 1404 | 37 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1028 | 1433 | 38 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 1028 | 1427 | 38 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 1090 | 1269 | 44 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 1090 | 1289 | 44 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 1115 | 1227 | 46 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 1115 | 1227 | 46 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 1115 | 1248 | 47 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 1118 | 1344 | 40 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 1147 | 1266 | 43 | TWL | |
2/1999 | 1147 | 1226 | 43 | TWL |