Ed Davis | Indianapolis, IN (USA)
|
|||
Rating
746
(Peak: 853)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
22-23-0 (0.489)
Career earnings: $40
|
Avg. score
316-359
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 100% (45 of 45)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 27% (12 of 45)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
4/2000 | 853 | 1740 | 21 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 853 | 1763 | 23 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 853 | 1773 | 22 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 853 | 1782 | 22 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 853 | 1796 | 22 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 853 | 1809 | 22 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 853 | 1819 | 23 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 853 | 1825 | 22 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 853 | 1830 | 22 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 853 | 1830 | 22 | TWL | |
4/2008 | 829 | 1850 | 15 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 916 | 1862 | 35 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 853 | 1863 | 24 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 916 | 1864 | 36 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 853 | 1879 | 24 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 916 | 1884 | 36 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 916 | 1892 | 36 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 916 | 1897 | 36 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 916 | 1908 | 37 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 916 | 1909 | 35 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 916 | 1910 | 37 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 916 | 1952 | 36 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 916 | 1958 | 36 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 916 | 1958 | 36 | TWL | |
11/2006 | 851 | 1971 | 29 | TWL | |
12/2006 | 851 | 1994 | 29 | TWL | |
3/2007 | 851 | 1994 | 29 | TWL | |
1/2007 | 851 | 1996 | 29 | TWL | |
10/2006 | 851 | 2012 | 29 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 851 | 2014 | 28 | TWL | |
2/2007 | 851 | 2016 | 28 | TWL | |
4/2007 | 851 | 2023 | 15 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 851 | 2053 | 29 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 851 | 2054 | 29 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 851 | 2055 | 28 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 851 | 2062 | 29 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 772 | 2067 | 16 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 792 | 2200 | 21 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 681 | 2226 | 11 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 792 | 2239 | 21 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 792 | 2242 | 20 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 792 | 2249 | 21 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 696 | 2250 | 13 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 792 | 2256 | 21 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 792 | 2261 | 21 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 792 | 2274 | 21 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 792 | 2275 | 21 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 792 | 2276 | 21 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 792 | 2289 | 21 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 792 | 2295 | 21 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 792 | 2296 | 21 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 720 | 2297 | 14 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 696 | 2315 | 13 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 720 | 2335 | 14 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 696 | 2337 | 12 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 696 | 2338 | 12 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 720 | 2339 | 15 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 786 | 2350 | 22 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 755 | 2367 | 19 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 720 | 2367 | 14 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 696 | 2383 | 12 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 769 | 2385 | 21 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 720 | 2387 | 15 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 769 | 2387 | 21 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 755 | 2388 | 17 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 755 | 2399 | 18 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 755 | 2409 | 18 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 769 | 2417 | 21 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 720 | 2427 | 15 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 755 | 2432 | 18 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 720 | 2436 | 15 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 755 | 2442 | 19 | TWL |