Eleanor Traeg | CA (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1546
(Peak: 1822)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
![]() |
Lifetime record
927-988-7 (0.484)
Career earnings: $4,768
|
Avg. score
363-369
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 99% (1899 of 1922)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 4% (67 of 1899)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
11/2000 | 1822 | 98 | 95 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1764 | 142 | 93 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1764 | 139 | 93 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1730 | 214 | 92 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1730 | 209 | 92 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1741 | 173 | 92 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1730 | 209 | 92 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1732 | 211 | 92 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1740 | 182 | 92 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1738 | 184 | 92 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1716 | 225 | 91 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1719 | 203 | 91 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1728 | 188 | 91 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1712 | 214 | 91 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1677 | 264 | 90 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1672 | 272 | 90 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1677 | 280 | 90 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1699 | 235 | 89 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1652 | 301 | 89 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1677 | 276 | 89 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1677 | 257 | 89 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1666 | 287 | 89 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1666 | 291 | 89 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1677 | 270 | 89 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1677 | 264 | 89 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1677 | 265 | 89 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1677 | 261 | 89 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1669 | 289 | 89 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1630 | 337 | 88 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1630 | 340 | 88 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1670 | 283 | 88 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1665 | 278 | 88 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1648 | 318 | 88 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1675 | 276 | 88 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1670 | 276 | 88 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1617 | 344 | 88 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1633 | 325 | 88 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1670 | 277 | 88 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1621 | 329 | 88 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1631 | 329 | 88 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1621 | 339 | 88 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1574 | 400 | 87 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1653 | 303 | 87 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1654 | 283 | 87 | TWL | |
9/2001 | 1646 | 304 | 87 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 1659 | 301 | 87 | TWL | |
10/2001 | 1633 | 322 | 86 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1585 | 385 | 86 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1576 | 397 | 86 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1584 | 407 | 86 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1574 | 411 | 86 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1574 | 405 | 86 | TWL | |
3/1999 | 1674 | 303 | 86 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1638 | 321 | 86 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1630 | 317 | 85 | TWL | |
4/1999 | 1665 | 328 | 85 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 1618 | 341 | 85 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 1618 | 341 | 85 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1632 | 313 | 85 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1622 | 329 | 85 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1628 | 314 | 85 | TWL | |
2/1999 | 1667 | 307 | 85 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1619 | 351 | 85 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1546 | 451 | 85 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1554 | 434 | 85 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1546 | 426 | 85 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1561 | 430 | 85 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1561 | 436 | 85 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1553 | 446 | 85 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1546 | 447 | 85 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1546 | 456 | 85 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1546 | 445 | 85 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1546 | 448 | 84 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1546 | 455 | 84 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1546 | 449 | 84 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1546 | 451 | 84 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1546 | 466 | 84 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1546 | 446 | 84 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1546 | 466 | 84 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1526 | 479 | 84 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1594 | 361 | 84 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1536 | 470 | 84 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1539 | 437 | 84 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1546 | 442 | 84 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 1580 | 384 | 83 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1574 | 395 | 82 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 1563 | 412 | 82 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 1557 | 419 | 81 | TWL |