Max Erskine | Salem, OR (USA)
|
|||
Rating
1407
(Peak: 1515)
|
Ranking
(unranked)
|
Lifetime record
374-411-1 (0.476)
Career earnings: $1,230
|
Avg. score
349-379
|
Percentage of player's games for which the opponent is known: 97% (765 of 786)
Percentage of those games that have scores known to cross-tables.com: 5% (42 of 765)
Date | Rating | Ranking | Percentile Rank | Lexicon | |
10/2001 | 1232 | 993 | 58 | TWL | |
2/2000 | 1287 | 871 | 60 | TWL | |
1/2000 | 1287 | 882 | 60 | TWL | |
4/2000 | 1287 | 874 | 60 | TWL | |
3/2000 | 1287 | 883 | 60 | TWL | |
2/2002 | 1256 | 946 | 60 | TWL | |
7/2000 | 1287 | 884 | 61 | TWL | |
5/2000 | 1287 | 878 | 61 | TWL | |
12/1999 | 1287 | 881 | 61 | TWL | |
11/1999 | 1287 | 890 | 61 | TWL | |
10/1999 | 1287 | 885 | 61 | TWL | |
3/2002 | 1256 | 967 | 61 | TWL | |
1/2002 | 1272 | 927 | 62 | TWL | |
12/2001 | 1272 | 930 | 62 | TWL | |
6/2000 | 1287 | 870 | 62 | TWL | |
11/2001 | 1272 | 923 | 62 | TWL | |
8/2000 | 1287 | 866 | 62 | TWL | |
4/2002 | 1271 | 936 | 62 | TWL | |
10/2002 | 1267 | 979 | 63 | TWL | |
9/2002 | 1267 | 998 | 63 | TWL | |
5/2002 | 1271 | 953 | 63 | TWL | |
6/2002 | 1271 | 956 | 64 | TWL | |
7/2002 | 1271 | 957 | 64 | TWL | |
4/2001 | 1324 | 842 | 64 | TWL | |
12/2000 | 1324 | 832 | 64 | TWL | |
1/2001 | 1324 | 834 | 64 | TWL | |
6/2001 | 1324 | 856 | 64 | TWL | |
11/2000 | 1324 | 840 | 64 | TWL | |
10/2000 | 1324 | 838 | 64 | TWL | |
9/2000 | 1324 | 833 | 64 | TWL | |
11/2002 | 1267 | 981 | 64 | TWL | |
12/2002 | 1267 | 980 | 64 | TWL | |
1/2003 | 1267 | 990 | 64 | TWL | |
8/2002 | 1272 | 954 | 64 | TWL | |
7/2001 | 1324 | 837 | 65 | TWL | |
8/2001 | 1324 | 838 | 65 | TWL | |
5/2001 | 1324 | 850 | 65 | TWL | |
3/2001 | 1324 | 846 | 65 | TWL | |
2/2001 | 1324 | 853 | 65 | TWL | |
6/1999 | 1375 | 736 | 67 | TWL | |
9/1999 | 1369 | 744 | 67 | TWL | |
8/1999 | 1369 | 757 | 67 | TWL | |
7/1999 | 1375 | 736 | 67 | TWL | |
2/2003 | 1335 | 859 | 69 | TWL | |
5/1999 | 1375 | 742 | 69 | TWL | |
7/2007 | 1411 | 652 | 70 | TWL | |
8/2007 | 1411 | 661 | 70 | TWL | |
9/2007 | 1411 | 648 | 70 | TWL | |
3/2003 | 1336 | 854 | 70 | TWL | |
6/2003 | 1349 | 818 | 71 | TWL | |
7/2003 | 1349 | 817 | 71 | TWL | |
5/2003 | 1349 | 815 | 71 | TWL | |
6/2007 | 1411 | 656 | 71 | TWL | |
4/2003 | 1349 | 826 | 71 | TWL | |
8/2003 | 1349 | 825 | 71 | TWL | |
9/2003 | 1354 | 784 | 71 | TWL | |
3/2004 | 1378 | 757 | 73 | TWL | |
1/2006 | 1411 | 718 | 75 | TWL | |
11/2003 | 1408 | 701 | 75 | TWL | |
2/2004 | 1400 | 712 | 75 | TWL | |
4/2004 | 1400 | 717 | 75 | TWL | |
5/2004 | 1398 | 716 | 75 | TWL | |
6/2004 | 1398 | 711 | 75 | TWL | |
7/2004 | 1398 | 709 | 75 | TWL | |
11/2005 | 1404 | 723 | 75 | TWL | |
12/2005 | 1411 | 717 | 76 | TWL | |
10/2005 | 1404 | 720 | 76 | TWL | |
3/2006 | 1411 | 691 | 76 | TWL | |
4/2006 | 1411 | 690 | 76 | TWL | |
5/2006 | 1411 | 682 | 76 | TWL | |
12/2003 | 1408 | 689 | 76 | TWL | |
6/2006 | 1411 | 685 | 76 | TWL | |
7/2006 | 1411 | 682 | 76 | TWL | |
8/2006 | 1411 | 684 | 76 | TWL | |
2/2006 | 1411 | 711 | 76 | TWL | |
9/2006 | 1411 | 672 | 76 | TWL | |
1/2004 | 1427 | 649 | 77 | TWL | |
10/2003 | 1419 | 660 | 77 | TWL | |
9/2004 | 1430 | 664 | 77 | TWL | |
8/2004 | 1430 | 637 | 78 | TWL | |
7/2005 | 1470 | 608 | 80 | TWL | |
9/2005 | 1470 | 589 | 80 | TWL | |
8/2005 | 1470 | 614 | 80 | TWL | |
6/2005 | 1470 | 601 | 80 | TWL | |
5/2005 | 1470 | 592 | 80 | TWL | |
3/2005 | 1470 | 586 | 80 | TWL | |
2/2005 | 1470 | 580 | 80 | TWL | |
12/2004 | 1476 | 573 | 80 | TWL | |
4/2005 | 1470 | 585 | 80 | TWL | |
1/2005 | 1476 | 571 | 81 | TWL | |
11/2004 | 1515 | 511 | 82 | TWL | |
10/2004 | 1515 | 509 | 82 | TWL |