| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Ron_Howard Ron Howard
#player2 Noah Noah
>Ron_Howard: IIIIII -IIIIII +0 0
>Noah: AABFGPU 8G FAB +16 16
#note Apparently AA>AU by quite a bit.
>Ron_Howard: ADEW 9F WADE +24 24
>Noah: AGILPUY 10I YUP +18 34
>Ron_Howard: EIOWZ 10B ZOWIE +46 70
>Noah: AGILSTT 11J TAG +18 52
>Ron_Howard: ENORT 12I TENOR +24 94
>Noah: EHILSST J2 HITLESS +79 131
>Ron_Howard: DEOV D8 VO.ED +32 126
>Noah: ACELNOQ 4H QA. +22 153
#note Or QI, but this seemed to make it easier to block SHITLESS, and blocked more lanes.
>Ron_Howard: BCEP 3I B.CEP +35 161
>Noah: CELNOSU 1F COUNSEL +91 244
>Ron_Howard: ?EGHIRT N1 REsIGHT +97 258
>Noah: ADEIIIV 5G VIA.ED +36 280
#note I can also play IVIED here, and maybe I should I can often score on line 5 next turn, while VIALED leaves with II on an especially bad board for it.
>Ron_Howard: NOO O4 NOO +15 273
>Noah: AIIIIJT -IIIIT +0 280
#note So what would you play here? I didn't want to keep a bingo leave like AT because this board isn't ripe for bingos. I didn't want to play JO because that is going south fast. I kept AJ because the J has potential at 9C and further, A works to hook for VOWED and score decently with the J, and I can potentiall draw a strong play underneath on row 11.
>Ron_Howard: DNR 11C R.ND +23 296
>Noah: ?AAFJOT 7C JATO +32 312
>Ron_Howard: ELM C9 M..EL +30 326
>Noah: ?AEFILS O1 EF +26 338
#note Is it better to bingo here? I thought not, so I blocked a good scoring spot and kept power-packed tiles.
>Ron_Howard: GIMNY M6 MINGY +25 351
>Noah: ?AILRSU 14C SImULAR +66 404
#note Not a good play. I saw InSULAR but forgot about it. I also missed SpIRULA completely. Oh well, these things happen :). I just need to write my plays down more consistently.
>Ron_Howard: AAIIOTU 15G AI +14 365
>Noah: EIKNRX 1F .......R.. +12 416
#note I think our tile set was missing an R! Hence this.
>Ron_Howard: AIOTU - +0 365
>Noah: EIKNRX E2 REKNI. +20 436
>Ron_Howard: AIOTU 4C TI.A +16 381
>Ron_Howard: AIOTU -- -16 365
>Noah: X K5 .X +18 454
>Noah: (AIOTU) +10 464
|
