| Player 1 |
|
#player1 jason_u jason u
#player2 cesar cesar
>jason_u: ENRTZ 8H NERTZ +48 48
>cesar: EHIPRSY L8 .EPHYR +46 46
>jason_u: IKP 10J KI. +19 67
>cesar: IIILNRS 11G LIRI +10 56
#note 14I IRIS... eh.... although, this is too few points. (-7)
>jason_u: INTUW K4 UNWI. +16 83
>cesar: ?AADINS 14I NAySAID +92 148
>jason_u: ARX 15H RAX +41 124
>cesar: BCEGMOT 4H BEG.M +26 174
>jason_u: LRV H10 V.RL +8 132
>cesar: CDEORTT O12 CO.E +30 204
#note (-2) 15N TO
>jason_u: DV I7 D.V +13 145
>cesar: DLNORTT 13J TO.T +23 227
>jason_u: BDELO H1 LOB.ED +33 178
>cesar: ADLNQRT 2F TR.LAND +12 239
#note doesn't seem right for me to do something like 5E NALED, but equity wise it sure seems best. 3 Us unseen, a blank, and i kill a couple of lanes, it doesn't seem that bad to do TROLAND, if only it was worth a bit more. (-6)
>jason_u: AEEG 1L AGEE +22 200
>cesar: AFIOQSW 1E QI +13 252
#note oh no!! bad miss! (-20)
>jason_u: AHJ G5 HAJ +29 229
>cesar: AFOOSTW 6K .OOF +18 270
#note or J4 GOO if i want to be more scared. WOOF is correct, right?
>jason_u: CEINS O6 SINCE +32 261
>cesar: AEOSTUW 12B OUTSWA.E +76 346
#note unintuitively, it seems outsware gives up more bingos than outswear? how is that possible? it's only by 2% so it could be statistical error. (-1.5)
>jason_u: AEFGOOU - +0 261
#note whew, challenge
>cesar: ?EEFGOU C9 FUG.E +26 372
#note E10 FUSEE is WINNINGER. i am probably blocking some double doubles. (-1%)
>jason_u: AI N10 AI +8 269
>cesar: ?EOOSUY E9 YOU.E +16 388
#note (-2) shoyu 14C
>jason_u: AEIMNPT D3 NAPTIME +87 356
>jason_u: AEIMNPT -- -87 269
>cesar: ?OS 14B OSe +14 402
#note (-3) I1 ALOES
>cesar: (AEIMNPT) +22 424
|
