| Player 1 |
|
#player1 JM JM
#player2 Bing Bing
>JM: ?EGNOOS 8H NOOdGES +68 68
>Bing: GINOTUV M2 OUTGIV.N +84 84
>JM: EHNTZ 6J ZEN.TH +40 108
>Bing: AADELOT 7H ADO +25 109
>JM: ANNSU O1 SUNNA. +30 138
>Bing: ADELLRT L8 .ALLED +18 127
#note Quackle likes the fish of DOL (I7,5). Looks like a pretty good idea.
>JM: IQ 9G QI +24 162
>Bing: EJPRRTX 11K P.EX +26 153
>JM: DI J6 ...ID +19 181
>Bing: EIJRRTV K3 JIV. +28 181
>JM: AI 10N AI +15 196
>Bing: EIRRTTW 4I WR.T.E. +20 201
>JM: OO K11 .OO +10 206
>Bing: FIPRTWY J12 WRY +27 228
>JM: GIN N10 ..ING +26 232
>Bing: BEFILPT 10F FILE. +32 260
#note The awkward racks continue, but at least I was scoring pretty well. Probably PELF (G4,25) is better here.
>JM: ABR 3G BRA +15 247
>Bing: ABEEPTT 5E BETTA +20 280
>JM: MOR 6D ROM +25 272
>Bing: CCEFLMP C3 CLEF +27 307
>JM: EKT 4A KE.T +26 298
>Bing: ACEHMPY A1 HAC.EY +54 361
#note Wow. I had no idea this was a phoney, honest!
>JM: DR 14H DR. +7 305
>Bing: AEEIMPU 11C PUMA +21 382
#note The triple was a smokescreen - Row 11 was the line to worry about. Actually, PIE (11D,15) looks to be a better block, winning 4 out of 8 cases, but it would have lost to AURIStS as it turned out.
>JM: ?AIRSSU 7A SIS +34 339
#note If I'd had any clue that HACKEY was bad, it was safe to challenge.
>Bing: EEIO H12 EI.E +18 400
>JM: ?ARU C11 .RUtA +12 351
>JM: (O) +2 353
|
