Game Details
Player 1
#player1 Kwak Kwak
#player2 Dave Dave
>Kwak: AACEORS 8C ROSACEA +70 70
#note Don't you love it when the duck starts like that?
>Dave: BCEIKOR 7I KOB +25 25
#note I spent a while on this move. There are several that score a few more points, but this is the best for managing the rack while still scoring. Quackle agrees.
>Kwak: ADDEIIL G5 DEI.IDAL +64 134
#note That's the reward for my hard work? The duck bingos again and I have nothing.
>Dave: CEEFIRU 9I FEU +24 49
#note I couldn't believe my terrible luck that with three red squares open I couldn't make a play to reach any of them. I saw the F spot at F6, of course, but I didn't want to make a play like EF F5 that would probably send me fishing on the next turn. However, I failed to spot CUIF, which is a much better way to hit that spot. Nonetheless, this play is not that much worse. Given that I'm already down by two bingos, it might even be a better choice, in order to maximize bingo chances.
>Kwak: AELNNTY 11E AN.LYTE +40 174
#note Oh great, the frakkin' duck didn't bingo this time. It just let up with a frakkin' 40 point double-double. And again I've failed to draw a bingo despite a promising leave. I hate this game!!!
>Dave: CEEIRUV H1 CURVE +45 94
#note At least I have this nice scoring play, keeping me within 100.
>Kwak: ADGLNUZ 6A UNGLAZ.D +103 277
#note *$#&@^$*@^$*(%$^&@^!!!!!!
>Dave: EEIIRTT H11 .ITE +8 102
#note You're down by almost 200. There's a triple-triple line open. You don't have a way to score. You're probably going to lose this game by a ton. What the hell do you do? This is the right play against *anybody*, human, computer, or duck.
>Kwak: AAEHOPT 12C APHE..A +36 313
#note HOLY MOTHERFRAKKIN' BEJEEZUS! TWO MORE I'S??? POKE MY EYES OUT PLEASE!!!! IT WOULD BE MORE FUN THAN PLAYING THIS GAME!!!!
>Dave: EIIINRT -II +0 102
>Kwak: EIOORTW 15D TWIER +42 355
>Dave: EEINRTV 3A INVERTE. +74 176
#note Woo hoo, a 74 point bingo. Aren't you impressed? Playing this at 3D might be better against the duck, because it might actually be retarded enough to leave the triple-triple open again. Then again, the way things are going, it would probably hit the nine-timer.
>Kwak: ?EGNOOT L1 GENTOOs +77 432
#note Just to let you know, if I had played INVERTER in the other spot, it still would have bingoed through the C. Frakkin' duck.
>Dave: FIIIJTW A5 F.JI +42 218
>Kwak: IOOPRSX 14E OX +55 487
#note It's what you expect right? Even on the "small" plays, it gets 55 and takes away my spot for IWIS.
>Dave: IINSTUW 13H .WIN +24 242
>Kwak: ILOOPRS 1L .OOP +21 508
>Dave: ?DIQSTU 10B QUID +41 283
#note QUEyS was 30 more, but I have to give myself the chance of at least bringing this within the range of respectability.
>Kwak: ILMMRRS 2G R.MMI.S +21 529
>Dave: ?AASSTY A10 SAYeST +51 334
#note I was just about ready to commit apostasy at this point.
>Kwak: BEGHLNR L12 HERB +32 561
>Dave: AO 1G O.A +12 346
>Dave: (GLN) +8 354
Player 2
Prevent game from appearing in all lists of uploaded games?
Prevent game from appearing in list of recently uploaded games?

 
Copyright © 2005-2024 Seth Lipkin and Keith Smith
Some data copyright © 1999-2009 National Scrabble Association and © 2009-2024 NASPA
SCRABBLE® is a registered trademark of Hasbro, Inc. in the USA and Canada.
Current time: 2024-07-24 18:33:44 Server IP: 162.144.19.21