| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 David_Pearl David Pearl
#player2 Jackson Jackson
>David_Pearl: DEORSTU 8D DETOURS +70 70
>Jackson: AAEIIMN D4 AIME. +16 16
#note maybe AIM, AMIE, AI.
>David_Pearl: AOZ C3 AZO +37 107
>Jackson: ?ADIINU E6 Ur.DINIA +71 87
>David_Pearl: ?AAEILR I7 A.tERIAL +59 166
>Jackson: AEEHRTX F5 EX +53 140
#note EX, HEX, HAET. HAET does reduce his score by 6-7, but EX scores that much more immediately and averages more next turn, even though HAET keeps guaranteed X plays, just cause AEHRT is so good, bingoes or gets HAET as a backup sometime. EX wins a sim
>David_Pearl: EHOP H12 PHEO +50 216
>Jackson: AEHLRTV J10 HEAT +41 181
#note bad miss of HALVAH, that looks better here. Also missed HET, didnt consider that, the A really balances out the leave, that looks better. HALVAH and HEAT sim similarly, but HET wins
>David_Pearl: DEIV J4 DIVE. +19 235
>Jackson: GLLRSVW 5I W.LL +14 195
#note wanted to get something going with h1. V(I)G 12D is interesting, to hit a W*LL play with UREDINIAL next turn and keep things tight. I don't mind that
>David_Pearl: BNR 13C BR.N +12 247
>Jackson: DGORSVY M1 GROVY +35 230
>David_Pearl: JKMOORS 4F KOR +22 269
>Jackson: ACDINST 2J CAI.D +28 258
#note I strongly felt KOR was a J setup, the way he played it. I shoulda listened to those instincts, I was worried he would have an N a lot after BRAN and hit the 1 row and I would be left with few options, but maybe that is too pessimiseic. With J implied CAIRD sims 12 below COD. Even with nothing implied COD and OD sim well. I wanted to have the CAIRDS lifeline for later, something else to threaten on the board. Hard to say, but I should have at least trusted my instinct more that it was a J setup
>David_Pearl: EJMOSUW 3G JO +36 305
>Jackson: ENNPSTT K12 NETT +17 275
#note (RE)PENT maybe, just go all in? I felt like the P was important to keep here for the B column, since the right side could easily get mucked up soon. RENT, which I strongly considered, sims best, ahead of NETT. I could also do NIT 10D to not give back as much. I relaly don't mind that, cause I can also make better (RE)? setups later. NETT was to try a multiple threat approach, maybe get some scoring threats, keep the P for later, keep my options a bit more flexible
>David_Pearl: CEO L10 ECO +24 329
>Jackson: GNPQRST K1 Q.T +12 287
>David_Pearl: AY 1M .AY +24 353
>Jackson: EGNNPRS 15K .ERNS +18 305
#note ideas welcome
>David_Pearl: AEIILMS N8 MILESIA. +74 427
>Jackson: BGGNNPT 9M B.G +9 314
>David_Pearl: EFIOSUW 11C WI.O +7 434
>Jackson: FGNNPTU O7 FU. +33 347
>David_Pearl: EFSU 10B FE +18 452
>Jackson: GNNPT G7 P.NG +11 358
#note FETING 3 better
>David_Pearl: SU F13 .US +5 457
>David_Pearl: (NT) +4 461
|
