| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Jonathan_Lindh Jonathan Lindh
#player2 Noah Noah
>Jonathan_Lindh: BEIIMTV 8G VIM +16 16
>Noah: DEEHLNY 7H HEY +20 20
>Jonathan_Lindh: BEEIOTU 6J BUTEO +28 44
>Noah: ADELNOZ L1 ZEALO. +50 70
>Jonathan_Lindh: AEGILOV 1L .EAL +39 83
#note Jon: 1K AZOLE for 42.
>Noah: DFINNOW M3 WIF.D +45 115
>Jonathan_Lindh: AGILLOV 9I OGIVAL +18 101
>Noah: LNNOOOU L8 O.OLO +18 133
>Jonathan_Lindh: IORRSST 13F TSORRIS +68 169
>Jonathan_Lindh: IORRSST -- -68 101
>Noah: DEEINNU M9 .DIEU +19 152
#note Noah: One of the early plays I had generated while thinking during Jonathan's turn was INDUE M11, which seemed quite risky. After his play, I wondered for a couple moments that it might have given me reason to play INDUE after all. Only for a couple moments. I can probably do better here. Macondo winners are K11 ENNUI and 2H ENDUE. Not sure I like ENDUE - if he responds above, even though it is a bit worse scoring than ROSTI, I just opened the top up. But ENNUI seems good.
>Jonathan_Lindh: IORRSST O6 SIR +17 118
#note Jon: O4 ROSTI for 26 is a few more.
>Noah: BDEINNN J9 .INNED +14 166
#note Noah: Main other consideration was B(LI)N, I think. Macondo prefers just playing at K8 given an inference.
>Jonathan_Lindh: ORRRSTX - +0 118
#note Noah: Exchange 4 here, which was odd to me. My best guess at the time was that he kept RST. Maybe ERS? Jon: Yep, you guessed it. kept RST.
>Noah: ABNNOQT I13 NOB +12 178
>Jonathan_Lindh: EGIJRST 15G JI. +36 154
#note Jon: I guessed Noah was keeping an A and I was right.
>Noah: AAACNQT N8 A.AN +17 195
#note Noah: Inferring RST, Macondo likes CANTHI/ACANTHI, which are fun, setting up QAT. This doesn't sim so well.
>Jonathan_Lindh: EGRSSTU O11 SURGE +25 179
>Noah: ?ACHIQT 6F HIC +24 219
>Jonathan_Lindh: EMORRST 5E ROM +19 198
>Noah: ?ACQRTU 4C QUA +26 245
#note Maybe C(AW) instead? Don't think I considered it.
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?EKRSTW 3E TWERK +21 219
>Noah: ?CEGNRT H1 CE.T +21 266
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?AAISXY 2N XI +38 257
>Noah: ?DEGNRT B2 DRaGNET +82 348
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?AAERSY A7 hEARSAY +87 344
>Noah: ENPPSTT 10F PEPS. +21 369
>Noah: ENPPSTT -- -21 348
#note Noah: I saw several plays which seemed to lose small - by two, I guess, though my memory as I was writing this said "by one". SEPT, SPENT, STEP, and PST all lose by two vs. optimality, I think I saw 3 or 4 of these. Also saw this, which I guess I wasn't sure about ... I didn't remember seeing it on the list of readditions, and it seemed like it had been expurgated / wasn't on Aerolith quizzes, on the other hand, what an odd-looking word to have been expurgated (maybe it's somehow a trademark which messes with things?? apparently it is a slur for French-Canadians) / maybe he'll allow it. My other idea was UPPEST*. I was close ... UPSTEP is the only legitimate win here. I also could've just taken the spread/hoped to somehow get a win with one of the two-point losses.
>Jonathan_Lindh: AF A1 FA +18 362
>Jonathan_Lindh: (ENPPSTT) +22 384
|
