| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Jackson Jackson
#player2 Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein Josh Sokol-Rubenstein
>Jackson: ACEHIII -III +0 0
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: EINQSTU H4 QUINTES +102 102
>Jackson: ACEEHNO I9 HOE +21 21
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: FIPRSTW J10 WRIT +31 133
#note I like TWIRPS/HOES or TWIRP and SOT more here. TWIRP has the highest valuation by 8
>Jackson: ACEIKNY 13H AN.ICKY +34 55
>Jackson: ACEIKNY -- -34 21
#note not good. even if a word, it is at best similar to TACKY or AY.
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: FNOPSTW 14J STOWP +34 167
#note UPTOWN looks like the play here. Josh can surmise that I have an E as my last tile, which he realized after playing stowp
>Jackson: ACEIKNY 15L YEAN +51 72
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: AFIJNOT 13L JO +43 210
>Jackson: CDHIIKR I2 KHI +25 97
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: ABFILNT 4H ..BLA +32 242
>Jackson: CDILRSU 12M LUD +13 110
#note considered CUDS and LUD - CUDS felt forced at first just to try and get back in range, but also it can make the right side of the board oddly hard to access longterm. LUD makes the board much better longterm
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: ?FINNTZ K3 F.INT +16 258
#note prob FIZ here
>Jackson: CIIMORS O8 MIRI. +24 134
#note didnt see OSMIC, prob that here. SCRIM as well
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: ?EINVXZ 13G VEX. +26 284
>Jackson: ?CGOOST 7B SCOOTi.G +65 199
#note with no inference, SCOOTING wins a sim by around 16 over GETS. With Z implied, GETS sims around 5 better. With ZIN implied, GETS sims 12 ahead. I should probably play GETS here. VEX plays at n7 for the same score, so the odds of this being a setup are very high. It wouldnt make sense to play VEXT in a board control way, cause the T at 8H also lets me reach westwrd, plus plays at H12 will make a lane that's hard for Josh to block. I think a Z is really reasonable to assume here, moreso than a generic scoring tile setup, and while a direct hit like ZIN may not be guaranteed, it is still likely enough that GETS is worth playing. GETS has the added advantage of making that hard to block lane on row 15.
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: ?FINORZ H12 Z.RO +69 353
>Jackson: AABDNNS 2B SANDBAN. +92 291
#note thought this was more than likely not a word
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: ?EEFINU - +0 353
>Jackson: AEILMOT 1A MOLA +28 319
#note I think it's important to reach for bingo % here, while it is good to threaten outscoring, I dont think it's too likely to happen here, so I should try to bingo. thats why I went for MOLA, the Is are short right now and this is the case T - I really wanted to keep AIT but for some reason didnt come up with MOLE in the same spot, with so many Es out AIT is ideal. Idk why I didnt think of that over the board.
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: ?EEFINU N6 FEU +18 371
>Jackson: CEEILTY 3C TYEE +33 352
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: ?AEINRR M4 sIERRAN +87 458
>Jackson: ACEEILP B6 E.CAPE +18 370
#note especial never wins, so trying some dumb stuff that also never really wins
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: DDEGIOV 12B DIVED +32 490
>Jackson: AAEGILR D12 .IG +7 377
#note AERIAL
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: GOU C9 GO +14 504
>Jackson: AAELR 15A AREAL +27 404
>Jackson: (U) +2 406
|
