| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Noah_Slatkoff Noah Slatkoff
#player2 Niel_Gan Niel Gan
>Noah_Slatkoff: CCEMU 8H CECUM +28 28
>Niel_Gan: AAEIPRY 9K PYA +20 20
#note PYAE(M)IA if I see it, esp after that 5 tile play. Sims very close though. Playing off only AY also worth considering.
>Noah_Slatkoff: ALOZ 10H LAZO +38 66
>Niel_Gan: AEIILRT 11G LIRA +19 39
#note Sims well above static because it scores best, reduces opp score, and bingoes just enough. One tile fish also not crazy here. Picked a play that kept T on purpose - I'm guessing it's often not worth it, but it was tempting here even with a bad lane because it's the only one with full range of motion and fits under L not guaranteed.
>Noah_Slatkoff: GINX M9 .XING +26 92
>Niel_Gan: AEEIKNT L11 KEA +27 66
#note Bad miss, back to hi prob review with me.
>Noah_Slatkoff: GL 12J GL.. +18 110
>Niel_Gan: EILNOTY 12D YONI +16 82
#note This was hard. My play bad at -6% vs a strong leave containing an S, which is what I was inferring at the time. If I see/know it, I prefer (LI)ONLY 30 here over the board/leave after INTEL 42. I will need to bingo soon, probably 2x assuming likely bing from Noah. After INTEL I absolutely need an S or blank draw - though things are looking bad enough that it's also reasonable to go for one on a 5 tile pull with all remaining. Issue is if Noah bingoes he could draw another as well and get both spots, because I so rarely hit a bingo with OY+5. INTEL even suppresses my bingo chances across multiple turns.
>Noah_Slatkoff: OWW 11C WOW +33 143
#note NG: easy oppo dump is suitable punishment for previous play
>Niel_Gan: ?DEELRT N3 REDEaLT +68 150
>Noah_Slatkoff: ?EGNSTU O9 SUrGENT +87 230
>Niel_Gan: DDNOTTU 4H UNDOTT.D +76 226
>Niel_Gan: AEFHOOR (challenge) +5 231
#note Had to go for it - no T's uncrossed or I's undotted. Not sure if that is how it is most attested though. Its anagram scores 78.
>Noah_Slatkoff: AJR 10B RAJ +30 260
>Niel_Gan: AEFHOOR 5H HOOF +40 271
>Noah_Slatkoff: FIV 6K FIV. +19 279
>Niel_Gan: AEEOORS 13B OOSE +28 299
#note Thought I needed points, which I do, but didn't look for plays like AE(R)O bc I overlooked how often they result in bingos in multiple places.
>Noah_Slatkoff: AIT 3K TIA. +24 303
>Niel_Gan: ABEEHRS 13G BAES +32 331
#note Terrible play, -11%. Saw TIARA but almost willfully didn't see the big plays in the O column. Thought process fix = ALWAYS look for highest-scoring play. BS or HS leave also quite good with that pool.
>Noah_Slatkoff: IQ 14A QI +26 329
>Niel_Gan: BEEHPRV H13 .RB +15 346
#note Probably should've played PEH here instead of on the next turn. ARB slightly less horrible vs some possible racks, but still bad. Points still very important, esp with 33 minimum almost guaranteed for Noah on next turn.
>Noah_Slatkoff: I A14 .I +33 362
>Niel_Gan: EEEHPTV 9A PEH +27 373
#note Wanted to score and block R.
>Noah_Slatkoff: ADEER O1 DEA.ER +43 405
#note NG: Again being punished for previous sins.
>Niel_Gan: EENSTUV 1H UNVESTE. +89 462
>Niel_Gan: (challenge) +5 467
#note I's undotted, options unvested. This win was a total fluke and I deserved to lose for lots of poor decision-making and a couple big misses.
>Niel_Gan: (AIIMNR) +16 483
#note I underscored PEH by 1 and forgot to include a +5 for PYAT.
|
