| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Jonathan_Lindh Jonathan Lindh
#player2 David_Engelhardt David Engelhardt
>Jonathan_Lindh: EGLLRSU 8G GULL +10 10
#note Seems fine.
>David_Engelhardt: HLOY J6 HO.LY +27 27
>Jonathan_Lindh: CEMRRSX K5 REX +34 44
#note Best.
>David_Engelhardt: ABNRW 10E BRAWN. +16 43
>Jonathan_Lindh: ACEEMRS E8 EM.RACES +78 122
#note Best.
>David_Engelhardt: DIOV 15A VOID. +33 76
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?JOPRTY 14B JO +38 160
#note Seems fine.
>David_Engelhardt: BIMU 8A IMBU. +30 106
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?NPRSTY 4K PRY +29 189
#note 4H TRYPSIN for 87 is the play. Did not see my bingo. My play is better than any bingo but 4H TRYPSIN, though. 14E ENCRYPTS for 70 plus some weaker placements of TRYPSINS are the other bingos.
>David_Engelhardt: ?EEELOT - +0 106
#note Exchange 4. Not actual rack.
>Jonathan_Lindh: ?KNNOST A3 STONK.Ng +62 251
#note Or A3 NONSTICK for 62. Not doing G1 STONKING for 64. That's asking for trouble.
>David_Engelhardt: EF D11 EF +22 128
>Jonathan_Lindh: AAEEFLT I7 F.A. +32 283
#note Best. Scored as 29.
>David_Engelhardt: HT M2 TH. +18 146
>Jonathan_Lindh: AEELRTT H10 .ATTLE +30 313
#note Seems fine.
>David_Engelhardt: CTU 3A .CUT +12 158
>Jonathan_Lindh: EEINRRT 4C TERRINE +72 385
#note Seems best.
>David_Engelhardt: EEWZ 5D WEE +24 182
#note David said he was keeping a Z here. Fantastic setup.
>Jonathan_Lindh: ADIINSU 6F DUI +16 401
#note However, I am hip to these kinds of setups. I snuffed it out immediately. DUI is best.
>David_Engelhardt: QZ G3 Q. +21 203
>Jonathan_Lindh: ADIINOS I13 AID +13 414
#note 3G QADI for 23 would have worked out better, but I wanted to take out bingo lines at the bottom.
>David_Engelhardt: ?EOZ 2J ZlO.E +66 269
>Jonathan_Lindh: AAIINOS 1N AI +8 422
#note B6 AIM for 17. My play was stupid because ZLOTES* doesn't exist. At the time, I thought it did.
>David_Engelhardt: AD 3I DA +21 290
>Jonathan_Lindh: AAINOSS J12 IONS +18 440
>David_Engelhardt: EEGGINV B10 IGG +10 300
#note 11B VEER for 7. This was a hard endgame for both of us.
>Jonathan_Lindh: AAIOOPS B6 AI. +17 457
#note I3 DEP for 6 to V stick David. None of us saw that play.
>David_Engelhardt: EENV F9 E.N +10 310
>Jonathan_Lindh: AOOPS 6A ..P +5 462
#note 14H LINO for 4 to set up APOS/OPAS. Now I see, I created NAV for David and block that, but I don't notice DEV.
>David_Engelhardt: EV C8 .E +5 315
>Jonathan_Lindh: AOOS 2J .....S +16 478
>Jonathan_Lindh: AOOS -- -16 462
>David_Engelhardt: V - +0 315
#note None of us see DEV.
>Jonathan_Lindh: AOOS D3 ...S +13 475
>David_Engelhardt: V - +0 315
>Jonathan_Lindh: AOO C2 O.. +3 478
#note Did not see SCUTA.
>David_Engelhardt: V - +0 315
>Jonathan_Lindh: AO 12A A. +4 482
#note Still SCUTA.
>David_Engelhardt: V - +0 315
>Jonathan_Lindh: O 14H ...O +4 486
#note F4 REDO for 5. At least I got a V stick. However, I went over by 12 seconds when there was no reason to do so.
>Jonathan_Lindh: (V) +8 494
#note Final score recorded as 481-315 because I underscored FLAN by 3 points and went over by 12 seconds.
|
