| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Chris_Cheng Chris Cheng
#player2 Adam_Henderson Adam Henderson
>Chris_Cheng: AEKRRRV 8D RAVER +18 18
>Adam_Henderson: IIIII -IIIII +0 0
>Chris_Cheng: EEKMORR F6 RE.OKER +26 44
#note E5 REM(A)KER : (
I considered F7 E(V)OKER, maybe that is situationally better than adding the R for 3 points. Either way, still much worse than the 2x2.
>Adam_Henderson: GHO E11 HOG +26 26
>Chris_Cheng: AFLMNOS G7 F.M +31 75
>Adam_Henderson: IJ 13C JI. +22 48
>Chris_Cheng: ?AALNOS C3 ANALOgS +74 149
>Adam_Henderson: IWY 4A WI.Y +28 76
>Chris_Cheng: BDEEFNT B1 DEF.NE +35 184
#note A4 (W)EBFED is amazing...
>Adam_Henderson: ITZ A6 TIZ +39 115
>Chris_Cheng: BDGNTTU -BDGNTU +0 184
#note Now that the Z is played, 12D B(OR)T might just about be worth it to play through this. There is still a Y along with 3 S's though. Maybe D1 DUT(Y) is also worth it. No other play makes sense given the score, so I think exchanging down to T or NT is fine.
>Adam_Henderson: TX D12 T.X +26 141
>Chris_Cheng: AEILMPY G11 MAY +24 208
#note Missed 1A I(D)LY : ( I don't think I saw the lane in row 10 using the (FEM)E hook either.
>Adam_Henderson: IU 1B .UI +5 146
>Chris_Cheng: EEGILPT D3 T.PE +24 232
>Adam_Henderson: ORSU H12 SOUR +26 172
>Chris_Cheng: ?EEGILO 14B GO. +31 263
>Adam_Henderson: ADT H7 T.AD +16 188
>Chris_Cheng: ?BEEILO 15A LIE +22 285
#note No excuses for missing these, rip.
>Adam_Henderson: B 13G ..B +11 199
>Chris_Cheng: ?BEEGOQ -EGOQ +0 285
#note Not sure if the B really helps at all, I guess at least it reduces the chance of me drawing too many of IUVW
>Adam_Henderson: DN E7 D.N +18 217
>Chris_Cheng: ?ABEILW 15G W.ItABLE +65 350
#note Wasn't 100% sure of BEWAILs, dropped 6 points to play a word I was sure of
>Adam_Henderson: CNOS O12 CONS +66 283
>Adam_Henderson: CNOS -- -66 217
>Chris_Cheng: AIIILQR -IIQ +0 350
#note Genuinely gave some thought into whether I should let this stay on the board, although I was 99% sure this S hook is a phony. If it is somehow valid and Adam bingoes with YOBS, I could be in a lot of trouble with this rack. Best case scenario I would play QI for 13 or so alongside the 7 and be up by 35 or so, less a tempo.
The word is too ridiculous though. I challenged and quickly exchanged IIQ.
>Adam_Henderson: CNO N12 ONC. +12 229
>Chris_Cheng: ACELR O8 LACER +27 377
>Adam_Henderson: AENOOPV - +0 229
#note desperation challenge
>Chris_Cheng: GI M12 GI +14 391
>Adam_Henderson: SV 13L V..S +15 244
>Chris_Cheng: HIU 10L HUI. +11 402
>Adam_Henderson: ESTT 3B ...TEST +11 255
>Chris_Cheng: AEINOOU H1 AU.O +15 417
>Adam_Henderson: ADENPQ N7 QAD. +19 274
>Chris_Cheng: EINO 11J ONE +11 428
>Adam_Henderson: ENP 10H .EP +22 296
>Chris_Cheng: I J14 I. +3 431
>Chris_Cheng: (N) +2 433
|
