| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Jackson Jackson
#player2 Yvonne_Lobo Yvonne Lobo
>Jackson: EEKNNTT H4 KENTE +28 28
>Yvonne_Lobo: ?ISTTUX -ISTT +0 0
>Jackson: FNOOTUV G5 FOUNT +22 50
#note not gonna do TOFU here
>Yvonne_Lobo: EHIINRS 10G SHINIER +71 71
>Jackson: BEGOPTV M9 P.OVE +26 76
#note considered BOG, keeping a potential overlap and keeping things tight, but I preferred getting things going on the board, even if it means being the underdog in terms of rack. I would rather not keep things tight as well in a first to hit race when I have an even worse leave, in some ways
>Yvonne_Lobo: OY F6 YO +30 101
>Jackson: AABDGOT 14J GOAD +22 98
#note really uninspired play - saw the word DAGOBA but not the DOUT spot, and missed AGATO(I)D for 36, which is the standout play. GOAD is trash. not my first stint with AGATOID blindness
>Yvonne_Lobo: LNRUWWY -LNRUWWY +0 101
>Jackson: AABILMT 15F BAALIM +37 135
>Yvonne_Lobo: DEENSTU E7 DETUNES +71 172
>Jackson: ADHINST I3 HIND +32 167
#note maybe D12 is a hair better, encourages sligthly more bingoes for me. I might play YONDS* which did make the I3 spot a bit more encouraging, but it's close. I did not see SADHE or SIDHE which are also really good options, ANT works really well on the board after that. I think HIND D12 is probably the play by a tiny bit
>Yvonne_Lobo: CIPR 8A PRIC. +36 208
>Jackson: ?AGIQST 9I QI +44 211
#note QAT ends up simming slightly better
>Yvonne_Lobo: GIZ B7 G.IZ +34 242
>Jackson: ?AAAGST J2 GATS +28 239
#note saw ASTANGA but thought it was phony, just ashtanga/asthanga. not good
>Yvonne_Lobo: EORY D12 YORE +28 270
>Jackson: ?AAAAIW C12 AWA +32 271
>Yvonne_Lobo: EFL 11K FL.E +26 296
>Jackson: ?AAEEIM 14F AMA +19 290
>Yvonne_Lobo: ?BLNOOW -BLNOOW? +0 296
>Jackson: ?EEIJOW O8 JOWs +46 336
#note felt pretty sick to burn a blank for 8 more points - obv never doing JO/JAR though, but I didnt love 8J JOW and K2 OWE for a couple reasons. After an x7, she likely draws the S or the blank, and FLOES is huge and not going anywhere. afer JOWS I struggle to see how she wins the game - she averages sub-20 in a sim, with really low standard deviation. This position was a bit more comfortable since I am confident in a tight endgame here, but I think I would still make this play against anyone, this wasnt a particularly adjustment-heavy play
>Yvonne_Lobo: BI 8J BI +9 305
>Jackson: EEILRTX L4 EXERT +32 368
#note seems to reduce her bingo % the most, to around 8
>Yvonne_Lobo: CET B13 TEC +23 328
>Jackson: ?DILNUV M4 LUD +18 386
>Yvonne_Lobo: OS N14 SO +18 346
>Jackson: ?EINOV K1 OI +5 391
>Yvonne_Lobo: ALRRU 1K .RA +4 350
>Jackson: ?ENV 2M NaV +12 403
#note REV/LUDE. I think I thought LUDES was sticky S
>Yvonne_Lobo: LRU N1 L.R +6 356
>Jackson: E 15N .E +6 409
>Jackson: (U) +2 411
|
