| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Jason Jason
#player2 Josh Josh
>Jason: DMNOSWW H7 WOW +18 18
>Josh: DEEFHIO I7 OHED +27 27
>Jason: DEKLMNS 8G K..L +11 29
>Josh: EFFIOOT 6I OOF +17 44
#note this helps him too much even when it blocks his bingos. I was trying to do too much. Just OF or OFF are probably better. #strategysmall
>Jason: DEMNNRS 5J MEND +28 57
>Josh: ABEFIMT 4L IAMB +29 73
#note this is actually a pretty counterproductive play. I need to admit I am at a disadvantage and play FIB 7K. This gives back too many bingos and scoring plays. I am setting up points on row 8, but also on row 4 with TEFF. Cool play that I should have seen. I saw BE(D)IM, which is also a lot better. #findingmedium #strategymedium
>Jason: CIINORS 3F INCISOR +64 121
#note R(AD)IONICS with a sticky S
>Josh: CEFTTUZ 7K FUTZ +26 99
#note Never considered that TUFT 4C blocks X and Q bombs. That alone makes it worth playing. I was really close to playing this but just felt Jason was too likely to play on row 2 anyway, but the Z has a decent future on this board anyway. Even if I assume Jason plays on row 2 a ton more often than random, TUFT is worth doing. I thought I was being mature, but I was just being cowardly. #strategymedium
>Jason: ELNORTY H1 ON.ET +24 145
#note I saw TRE(B)LY but doubted its validity, this is second best.
>Josh: CEEGOST 2D COGE.T +24 123
#note was interesting between COGE(N)T and G8 (K)EG. Again, I was afraid of the 2 row, but he's also less likely to hit it than average because of ONCET. This wins the sim by 5 points but it might be closer given KEG's recursive factor and Jason's partial rack being not equipped for the 2F spot. #questionable
>Jason: AALQRUY 5D QUAR. +28 173
>Josh: ADEGISS 3F .......S +28 151
#note really wasn't sure how to proceed here. 6C GIS looked interesting to set up EGIS, but I never thought about AEGIS after, thought Jason could just block by ending in E. 8N AG was also a thought. I figured this play could induce some errors, so I did it. It's probably not correct #questionable
>Jason: AAANSYY 8N AY +26 199
#note As much as I wanted to play AYAYA, I really can't after his last play
>Josh: ADEGIST 9M AG +17 168
#note this isn't great, he can easily block and I'm very rarely hitting anywhere else. I should probably just go with GAIT 6B. Could do KEG still, lots of E's to come. #questionable
>Jason: AALNSUY 10K LAYS +30 229
#note USA(B)LY is standard but after his fishing plays I wanted to address the easy lane he just created. His last two plays suggests he likely doesn't have a blank so I felt the equity sacrifice was justified.
>Josh: ?DEIIST E4 n.DITIES +66 234
#note He drew a blank :(
>Jason: ?AANRUX 11J RAX +33 262
>Josh: AEILPRV D9 PREVAIL +84 318
#note ridiculous, this is how you do it folks
>Jason: ?AEGINU 15D .EAGUINg +74 336
>Josh: DEELTTV 12K VELDT +46 364
#note VET in the same spot is probably worth playing, since I have all of the remaining hooks for AXE. Didn't think much here, since this looked very good for timing and for winning the game. #questionable
>Jason: ABJNORR G8 .ARN +16 352
#note This is champ player's top choice, going for O1 JOB(B)ER.
>Josh: EEHINPT O1 HEN.IT +33 397
#note yeah, figured this couldn't lose.
>Jason: BEIJORU 13C J.BIRU +32 384
>Josh: EEP N12 .EEP +14 411
>Josh: (EO) +4 415
|
