| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein Josh Sokol-Rubenstein
#player2 Jackson_Smylie Jackson Smylie
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: AAEENOS -AEO +0 0
#note AENS famously being as good as ENS in a vacuum, to many ppl's surprise
>Jackson_Smylie: AFLMNST H6 FLAM +18 18
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: ?AEINRS I5 SEARINg +73 73
>Jackson_Smylie: EINRSST 11E STIN.ERS +78 96
#note considered TARRINESS for 2 more, looked close overall cause it gives him first crack at the open board, plus was not 100% sure
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: ELNOQRU 5I .UQ +24 97
>Jackson_Smylie: AAIOTUY 12A YAUTIA +30 126
#note didnt consider NOYAU, that looks better. playing like a wad of gum
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: ELNNOOR A8 LOON. +24 121
>Jackson_Smylie: DEEGIIO B6 GEOID +26 152
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: EKMNORX C6 OX +37 158
#note MOKE is 44 here, looks worth it
>Jackson_Smylie: AAEEIPT 13B ETAPE +30 182
#note PIETA and PAISE are not bad plays either. lots of Es so AI is not so bad
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: EKMNRVW J4 V.M +28 186
>Jackson_Smylie: ADDEIOO 3J ODEA +19 201
#note this is the highest static play, crazy. looked so bad and hated to play it. Q likes NAOI, which I did not consider, but if I think VUM is a forced play and doesn't hold an O, it is nice. Given he has an O at least more than average, ODEA looks worth it, cause its quite a bit better with O specified
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: CEKNRWW 5C CREW +30 216
#note Q prefer KN(E)W slightly here, lots more standard dev for Joshs next average score, but he averages quite a lot, probably cause he gets big WACKIER type plays sometimes. My average doesn't go up by so much, since CREW lets me bingo a bit more often.
>Jackson_Smylie: BDIIINO 4L NIDI +18 219
#note Didn't see BI(R)O or seriously consider it, it looks like a better version of this play, just more defensive. I didnt consider 2K IODIN, which is super aggressive but may be better on the whole as well. I think either play is better than this one, though theyre all close in a sim
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: IKLNOWY O1 WIK. +33 249
>Jackson_Smylie: BBCIJLO L7 JIBB. +17 236
#note strongly considered BLO(W) here, which draws JIBE(R) with an E and BLOWJOB with an O. however, when JIBER gets blocked or I dont draw an E or O, BCIJ can go south really fast. JIBBS is just too standard to pass up
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: LNORSTY M6 TONY +35 284
#note NYLON is aggressive, but does improve his spread on average, so could be worth it. looks close
>Jackson_Smylie: CEEELNO A1 EOCENE +31 267
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: AEFLRST 8K F..AL +24 308
#note I think LOAF or 2a OF might be better here. I probably don't play OF, cause bingoes can get hit back with Z plays or other bingoes, but apparently LOAF bingoes more than FINAL and scores more on average, so it's hard to justify. TAEL is also helpful for some bingoes, I'm sure
>Jackson_Smylie: EHLRUUZ 2A .UZEL +28 295
#note I didn't see the bingoes I could draw into with CUZ, LUTHIER and LAUGHER, so I should def play that to go for them. I figured OUZEL would draw into occasional bingoes, which it does, but fewer, so its not worth it.
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: AEIRRST 1D TARRIES +79 387
>Jackson_Smylie: ?AHORUV 3A .HAd +45 340
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: DGGHPT E4 P.G +6 393
>Jackson_Smylie: ORUV D12 ..U +3 343
>Josh_Sokol-Rubenstein: DGHT 1A .H +14 407
>Jackson_Smylie: ORV 1L VRO. +14 357
>Jackson_Smylie: (DGT) +10 367
|
