| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Maddy_Kamen Maddy Kamen
#player2 Noah Noah
>Maddy_Kamen: EINVX 8D VIXEN +38 38
>Noah: EGIMQTT 7E GEM +28 28
#note I wasn't sure between this and TIME. TIME sims a bit better.
>Maddy_Kamen: EEHINR 6F HEREIN +45 83
>Noah: CINQSTT K4 CI.Q +30 58
#note Considered QI, but I ended up going with CINQ, probably sort of because CNSTT looks ugly and the CINQS setup seemed pretty good. QI is simming slightly better.
>Maddy_Kamen: RY 4K .RY +16 99
>Noah: AHNOSTT 8K SHOTT +52 110
#note Wasn't sure between this and SHOAT. Sim likes my play by a little.
>Maddy_Kamen: EELTW H1 WELTE. +30 129
>Noah: ?AEEGNU 3L EAU +18 128
>Maddy_Kamen: EILOPRR N5 POR.LIER +64 193
>Noah: ?EFGJNW O4 JEW +30 158
>Maddy_Kamen: ANNOU 3C NOUNA. +14 207
>Noah: ?FGINNO 1E FrO.NING +66 224
>Maddy_Kamen: DIU 4B DUI +14 221
>Noah: AEOPRRZ M10 PREZ +38 262
#note Tricky. I mainly looked at this and HAZER. I think I also saw REPRO and RAZOR. Sim doesn't like this so much, and likes RAZOR over the other options -- I guess EPR works well after it. I'm kind of tempted by REPRO to keep a less open board.
>Maddy_Kamen: DSV I5 D.VS +31 252
>Noah: AADIIOR O12 RAIA +19 281
>Maddy_Kamen: ?AABLST N14 BA +18 270
#note Maddy told me I blocked ALABASTER here! I think this was her rack. On my scoresheet, I wrote down "*softly* 'one of those games'..' (?)" around here. Then I wondered how speech can have ellipses. I don't remember whether Maddy said what I transcribed just after I played RAIA, but if so, maybe it was because I blocked ALABASTER.
>Noah: DIOU 2J DUO +22 303
#note Again not sure of the whole rack, maybe like DEIMOOU? I sort of feel like I had 3 vowels.
>Maddy_Kamen: ?ALST M6 TA. +13 283
>Noah: CGI 2A CIG +16 319
#note Not sure what I had here. I think that I at least had the M and saw MIG, but that this looked better to give back less scoring.
>Maddy_Kamen: OY 11K YO.. +14 297
>Noah: AAELMOT 10H LOAM +15 334
>Maddy_Kamen: K D3 ..K +7 304
>Noah: ABEFOST 5C S.A +19 353
#note I mistracked and thought the pool was ADEELST? here. While thinking about this turn during the game, I wrote down bingos I could give back with each play (given the tiles I believed to be unseen). After writing down maybe 3 or 4 draws, I was surprised that I had written down DESALTED each time (actually, I wrote DELISTED in the first row, but I think I didn't notice this / forgot at the time), but I think I realized "of course DESALTED works every time". But I guess I was sort of on auto-pilot, because I ended up writing DESALTED in every following row...I think once would've been enough! :p. I think I kept BEFOT here, but maybe not. FAS looks about as likely as SKA to win given the actual pool, because it doesn't give Maddy any possible bingos with racks she has no bingos with after SKA, and she would have seemed likely to find bingos elsewhere with the racks that bingo from the F (I think she had 4-10 minutes left to look with). FAS might thus be better for spread.
>Maddy_Kamen: ?AEILST D8 .EALIeST +72 376
>Maddy_Kamen: (BDEFOT) +24 400
|
