| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Wally_Schultz Wally Schultz
#player2 Noah Noah
>Wally_Schultz: ADIOZ H4 DIAZO +34 34
>Noah: IKNNOOU G3 NOOK +20 20
#note Considered ZOUK and UNKIND, sim is liking this by a bit. I simmed most of this game under NWL20 before noticing that in the endgame. That could make a difference. (NOOKY here, for example, but YZ plays are so unlikely).
>Wally_Schultz: IQ F2 QI +33 67
>Noah: EEEINOU -EEOU +0 20
#note I wasn't sure whether to keep EN. This is simming better.
>Wally_Schultz: AES I6 SAE +25 92
>Noah: EEILNRT H4 .....LE +17 37
#note Nice to see this - I think I noticed it a little while, but not very long, after my turn had started.
>Wally_Schultz: EHINOSU 11B HEINOUS +88 180
>Noah: AEILNRT C7 ELAT.RIN +70 107
>Wally_Schultz: DEIOSTU B2 OUTSIDE +75 255
>Noah: EEHLSUW 14B U.WHEELS +82 189
#note Wasn't sure on this one, I guess ... though I still feel I might be self-deceiving or a little purposely unclear about whether I think words are phony, and potentially around intentional phonies, I think because I feel a little weird about deceiving people. It feels weird to be like "yup, I think I just know better than you here and my expectation on how to deceive you here seems worth betting on", especially given these are real people involved in the world in other ways, that I e.g. might talk to after the game. But part of me still wants to play intentional phonies. So part of my mind seems unintegrated here. Also, I am still confused about what it even means to say "I am x% sure of something" / why I would decide to say something like that. Maybe it *isn't* meaningful and I should think about things in a different way than that. Anyway, this play worked out - he held and released. 1/23/23: I think I wrote the foregoing the morning after I played the game against Wally. I think I feel sort of different now ... for more, see the note on my challenge of Orry's UNpLOWED in the first game I played against him in this CCC.
>Wally_Schultz: ACO A7 OCA +34 289
>Noah: ACIMNOY A1 CYMA +48 237
#note There are some pretty options here: MORNAY and AMNIO. This looks like the play by a lot, though - besides scoring more, sim suggests to me that CYMA keeps a much better leave than those other two plays in this position.
>Wally_Schultz: EEF 13G FEE +25 314
>Noah: ILMNOTV 12A MO.N +27 264
#note Took me a while to see VOMIT, and I decided I didn't want to play it, I guess mostly because of how blocky it was.The D4 scoring spot opened by VOMIT also seems to hurt its case. I think either this or MORT is correct. MORT sims a bit better.
>Wally_Schultz: DER 15F RED +32 346
>Noah: IILTTTV -VITTL +0 264
#note I'm pretty sure I'm supposed to exchange here, but I wasn't sure what to exchange. I did some simming earlier, and I'm not sure there was a clear winner. There were differences on ranking for percentage and valuation. Probably not a huge deal.
>Wally_Schultz: BFOR E3 FORB +24 370
>Noah: ?AEITTX 12I TAXITEs +79 343
#note Lucky draw.
>Wally_Schultz: NTV N11 V.NT +14 384
>Noah: ?AEILTU 11K ALI.E +39 382
#note Another good draw! Now I'm in pretty good shape, I think.
>Wally_Schultz: DGIR O7 GRID.. +21 405
>Noah: ?JPRTUW 15L JUsT +61 443
#note Pretty sure this is worth burning the blank for, maybe by a lot.
>Wally_Schultz: AV M10 V..A +18 423
>Noah: GPPRRWY F10 W.G +15 458
>Wally_Schultz: ABGIN D4 BA +18 441
>Noah: PPRRY 7H ..PPY +21 479
>Wally_Schultz: GIN 15A IN +8 449
>Noah: RR 10H .RR +5 484
>Noah: (G) +4 488
|
