| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Noah Noah
#player2 Julia_Bogle Julia Bogle
>Noah: AEIJRTU 8D JURAT +40 40
>Julia_Bogle: IQRU H4 QUIR. +24 24
>Noah: EFIIITW F2 WIFTIE. +23 63
>Julia_Bogle: LLOY D8 .OLLY +30 54
>Noah: IINORTZ I3 ZIT +35 98
#note Sim prefers ZIN by ~1.14 win% and 2.6 valuation after 2580 iterations.
>Julia_Bogle: AENOOUV - +0 54
#note She exchanged 6 here - we talked about this rack after the game, and I'm pretty sure this was it. I didn't see ZOUAVE in the post-mortem - it looks like the clear play. (I still have no idea how to justify something like "ZOUAVE is the clear play.")
>Noah: CGINORS 9H SCORING +79 177
>Julia_Bogle: CDDEORU M8 U.CORDED +74 128
>Julia_Bogle: CDDEORU -- -74 54
>Noah: ?EGLOTY M3 TeLEGO.Y +76 253
#note Insta-challenged - I maybe should've held and looked for 3x3s first, but I don't think I even considered them. No eights contain DEGLOTY.
>Julia_Bogle: CDDEORU 11C C.OUDED +22 76
>Noah: AEEFKPT E2 APEEK +46 299
>Julia_Bogle: AMM N4 MAM +28 104
#note I think she significantly overscored this when playing it, maybe as 34 or so, and after she hit her clock, we corrected the error.
>Noah: AAFHIOT 12H FAITH +42 341
#note Not sure this is the right rack. Mostly considered FAH and FAITH here. HAAF might actually be worth it for spread, because after it, I think I am still very very likely to win on average even if Julia 3x3s.
>Julia_Bogle: EEEEEE -EEEEEE +0 104
>Noah: ABEIOOR O5 BOOR +28 369
#note Not sure I considered OBOE O1, but BOOR plays better scoring defense.
>Julia_Bogle: IX 10F XI +53 157
>Noah: AAEEILT N8 A.E +16 385
>Julia_Bogle: AESV J2 VASE +41 198
>Noah: AEILPST O10 APLITE +33 418
#note Hm, maybe LAP G1 instead. Or like PE 10J. Lots of options, idk the differences. Marginal spread play.
>Julia_Bogle: EW N14 EW +19 217
>Noah: BINSSUV M12 SUB +27 445
>Julia_Bogle: ADEEGNR K6 REG.AN.ED +72 289
>Noah: EINNOSV 9C N. +3 448
>Julia_Bogle: ?ADHNOR L2 DAH +30 319
>Noah: EINNOSV B4 VENISON +67 515
>Noah: (?NOR) +6 521
|
