| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Joe_Gaspard Joe Gaspard
#player2 Noah Noah
>Joe_Gaspard: AADGIO 8C ADAGIO +20 20
>Noah: GINNTUU C6 UN.U +6 6
#note Very close in a sim with UNAU E6, reminding me of chess openings.
>Joe_Gaspard: EHU F6 HU.E +16 36
>Noah: ?EFGINT G3 FIlET.NG +78 84
#note Or perhaps uNGIFTED D1.
>Joe_Gaspard: EFIL H1 LIEF +47 83
>Noah: ?AEHORT 1H .OATHERs +92 176
>Joe_Gaspard: ADOW 2J WOAD +39 122
>Noah: AAIINPR B2 APIAN +22 198
#note I drew this rack and quickly saw RIPARIAN, hoping he wouldn't block, and thinking my backup was RAPINI B2 or something like that. Once he had played WOAD, I think I played this pretty quickly, and, very quickly after, when wondering about what back hooks APIAN takes (answer: none), my mind stumbled upon the word APIARIAN and noticed that I could've played it!
>Joe_Gaspard: DEKN E7 N.KED +30 152
>Noah: IOPRRTV L1 ..VIOR +24 222
#note Put down TROP A1 first.
>Joe_Gaspard: AIRY D10 AIRY +19 171
>Noah: LOPRRTX A2 LOX +41 263
#note I don't think I would've expected LOX to win a sim by this much over POX - like 5 points.
>Joe_Gaspard: IOZ 6J ZO.I +33 204
>Noah: INPQRRT 4K Q. +11 274
#note PORT sims significantly better on win%, while it is very close with QI on valution. The discrepancy makes sense because there is a huge dropoff in post-QI play quality after sPRINTER and sURPRINT. idk if I want to play PORT though, kind of don't like keeping the Q here, even with TRANQ draws. ;)
>Joe_Gaspard: EJT D4 JET +23 227
>Noah: GINPRRT 13B PR.ING +28 302
>Joe_Gaspard: BEES B10 BEE.S +30 257
>Noah: EELMRST O1 .MELTERS +80 382
>Joe_Gaspard: ASTW 7I TAWS +37 294
>Noah: ABCEMOR E4 OM +25 407
>Joe_Gaspard: UV 10G .UV +7 301
>Noah: ABCDEOR A8 CRAB +32 439
>Joe_Gaspard: CEINSTY N8 ICY +18 319
>Noah: DELO M10 OLDE +15 454
>Noah: (ENST) +8 462
|
