| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Noah Noah
#player2 Bennett_Jacobstein Bennett Jacobstein
>Noah: ABEJNQT H7 QAT +24 24
#note G1, Portland WGPO 1day, 11/14/21
>Bennett_Jacobstein: EGI I6 GIE +19 19
>Noah: BEEJNNR 9C JENNE. +22 46
>Bennett_Jacobstein: ET E9 .ET +6 25
>Noah: ABKPRWW D8 K.BAR +38 84
>Bennett_Jacobstein: L G9 .L +2 27
>Noah: EIPPWWY C11 PEW +23 107
>Bennett_Jacobstein: S 9C ......S +21 48
>Noah: IOPUVWY F11 YUP +17 124
>Bennett_Jacobstein: ABO J4 ABO +12 60
>Noah: GIILOVW 4I V.GI +16 140
#note Thought of AVOW only after playing this. My sim has VAGI slightly ahead on win%, AVOW slightly ahead on valuation. BOW is also very close in the sim.
>Bennett_Jacobstein: AET K4 .ATE +22 82
>Noah: ACHILOW 3K ALOW +22 162
#note I think I considered HOWL B12 but opted for this pretty quickly.
>Bennett_Jacobstein: EGINNST L7 NESTING +70 152
>Noah: CHIIMRR 8L .MIR +18 180
>Bennett_Jacobstein: AET K11 TEA +15 167
>Noah: CHILRRZ N6 CH.RR +18 198
#note Tricky. Mainly considered WHIZ, this, and ZILCH. WHIZ was tempting, but blocking with this was compelling, especially given his fishy-looking TEA play. The Z doesn't look great to me on the resulting board, but maybe I can just control things and never let him catch back up. I don't think I saw 10L TIZ, which is interesting. It blocks similarly to CHIRR, and the ZILCH draw is pretty nice. I can also get hosed badly by it due to the leave and potential for e.g. big two-turn responses from him.
>Bennett_Jacobstein: MOO 2M MOO +24 191
>Noah: CIILOUZ 13F .ULI +8 206
#note Needed a K for OKULICZ.
>Bennett_Jacobstein: DEFN 1L FEND +56 247
>Noah: CIINOOZ F6 ZOO. +33 239
#note Also considered COLIN. Quackle prefers it -- it seems to think I actually score quite well afterward. Perhaps it has Bennett open scoring spots, which could be right. On the post-ZOON board, I can also draw into things like ZOO(N), HAZE/FAZE/YEZ B12, and DOZE M12. I don't seem to bingo much with IOZ, though.
>Bennett_Jacobstein: OX H13 .OX +30 277
>Noah: ?CEIINS 15G E.CISINg +67 306
>Bennett_Jacobstein: AIV G4 VIA +17 294
>Noah: ADDERTU M12 DA +18 324
#note Questionable. I think I was kind of excited about drawing into REDEFEND or maybe FOREFEND, though I had an idea that REDEFEND might not be valid -- I think I remembered discussing this with Sid and Josh, on this turn or maybe later in the game. Not really sure what to consider here.
>Bennett_Jacobstein: HOY B12 HOY +29 323
>Noah: ADELRTU 15A LAUD +31 355
>Bennett_Jacobstein: ?DEFRSU O12 FEDS +87 410
>Bennett_Jacobstein: ?DEFRSU -- -87 323
>Noah: EIRT I2 RE. +7 362
#note This is optimal, but I think ER 11N was probably better.
>Bennett_Jacobstein: ?DEFRSU H1 DEF +28 351
>Noah: IT 4N TI +10 372
>Noah: (?RSU) +6 378
|
