| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 Jackson Jackson
#player2 Sid Sid
>Jackson: AIILNPS H4 PIANI +20 20
#note might play PI against some people, or exchange I, but I like PIANI against sid
>Sid: INXY G6 NIXY +33 33
>Jackson: AFGHILS 4A FLAGSHI. +92 112
>Sid: EEINORT E4 .EROTINE +82 115
>Jackson: AEEUUWY -AEUUWY +0 112
#note I think I should do (R)U(NA)WAY here, it opens the right as well, which makes the XIS hook less important, which is comforting for me
>Sid: JOSU 8A JOUS. +39 154
>Jackson: AEEIRTU D10 URAEI +14 126
#note obviously f10 instead of this, didn't even consider it somehow. It makes the scoring spots I'm opening a lot less bad, and hangs the floaters more in the open for me. I considered JEU and other plays like that, but I don't see AEIRT doing much for me here. I'd sooner do URINATE than JEU to open the board.
>Sid: OOR C13 ROO +12 166
>Jackson: AEILTVW F9 VIEW +29 155
#note I could do REVIEWAL here, but he has a fairly decent range and reviewal opens a really easy scoring spot that kills the board for him, so I'm happy playing the waiting game.
>Sid: EEMN B11 NEEM +25 191
>Jackson: ABGLPTW A10 GAWP +31 186
>Sid: CDE C3 D.CE +14 205
>Jackson: ABLQTTU B6 BL.T +22 208
>Sid: AEHOORS -AEH +0 205
>Jackson: ALLQTUU D1 QUA. +27 235
#note very happy to keel the U here and an almost guaranteed 1 row play
>Sid: ERT A1 TRE. +21 226
>Jackson: EILLTTU 1D .UILT +42 277
>Sid: HO 3F OH +23 249
>Jackson: BDEEGLT F9 ....ED +17 294
#note I feel like his range is quite good at this point, but I could do something like LEG, which I considered. he has to have a fairly specific rack to hit the spot, but he did keep an O, which doesn't bode well for him not having an O. I think viewed is fine, I am just hoping for a couple reparallels to close XIS, since I hate that being open
>Sid: EKNO G11 KENO +28 277
>Jackson: BDEGILT H13 GED +23 317
#note over DEB to make a worst 8s lane, since that lane aint getting blocked
>Sid: EFNS I5 FENS +30 307
>Jackson: ABCDILT 2H ALCID +16 333
#note Maybe I should play DIDACT here. I considered it seriously, and maybe underestimated how much BL helps me out. I was a bit nervous cause I felt like he had an S more often than usual after FENS, though it's by no means a guarantee. I can also exchange 7 here, which seems like a fine line. I did like that this can outrun some non-bingo sequences that force him to empty the bag. ALCID can also give back really annoying Z plays that outrun me, which was a worry. I think I should probably do didact, the aggressive line here. I did consider that Sid would either doubt ALCIDS' validity, or that it was actually no good and I'd catch him on a challenge.
>Sid: ?AORSTY M1 OSTiARY +85 392
>Jackson: ABMRTVZ - +0 333
>Sid: ?AO L5 bOA +10 402
>Sid: (ABMRTVZ) +46 448
|
