| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Merrill_Kaitz Merrill Kaitz
#player2 Sam Sam
>Merrill_Kaitz: ELTUX 8D EXULT +26 26
>Sam: BCDLNPT F6 BL.NT +15 15
>Merrill_Kaitz: INOU 9E U.ION +21 47
>Sam: CDEJOPW 7B JOW +19 34
>Merrill_Kaitz: HO 8A HO +24 71
>Sam: CDEIPPR 10H PEP +20 54
>Merrill_Kaitz: CEIT 11H ETIC +25 96
>Sam: ?CDIRRS 12F RID +16 70
#note Quackle's favorite is CRIS 11C, which I wouldn't play.
>Merrill_Kaitz: AMYZ E11 MAZY +41 137
>Sam: ?ACMRRS C3 MACR. +18 88
>Merrill_Kaitz: HO D3 OH +24 161
>Sam: ?FFRRSS -FFRS +0 88
#note Missed SPIFF J9. Things aren't looking up at this point.
>Merrill_Kaitz: AI E4 AI +10 171
>Sam: ?ABDORS K8 BRO.ADeS +70 158
#note I put down BOmBARDS first, then saw BROCADeS and pulled the play back. I thought for at least a minute then played BROCADeS. Merrill said he would have went with BOmBARDS. Had I known and seen SkYBOARD I would have definitely played that.
>Merrill_Kaitz: AEGINOT 15F AGONI.T +27 198
#note Merrill commented after the game that he was one off from EGESTION here.
>Sam: ADEIIRS L4 DIARIES +84 242
>Merrill_Kaitz: EEIS 13B SIE.E +30 228
>Merrill_Kaitz: EEIS -- -30 198
>Sam: ?FFGNNW 12J N.FF +25 267
#note WYN is interesting, but NAFF's probably better anyway.
>Merrill_Kaitz: EEIS 13B SEI.E +30 228
>Sam: ?AGLNSW N6 WANGLeS +81 348
#note My two choices were WArSLING and WANGLeS. Quackle thinks I should have sacrificed the equity, giving WArSLING a higher win% value. I guess there are huge O-line bingos I'm susceptible now, and my spread was already one of the highest in the division, if not the highest. I probably didn't need to take the risk.
>Merrill_Kaitz: EEY O6 EYE +34 262
>Sam: AEGKOTU 14I OK. +34 382
#note Was deciding between this and UKe.
>Merrill_Kaitz: QU 6J QU. +32 294
>Sam: AEEGRTU I3 GETA +20 402
#note RUGA I3 also works.
>Merrill_Kaitz: D 13B .....D +23 317
>Sam: AENORRU B7 ..URNO. +16 418
#note Or URARE H1.
>Merrill_Kaitz: EEILTVV M1 VIVE +23 340
#note Two better at K1.
>Sam: AER 1L A.ER +24 442
>Sam: (ELT) +6 448
|
