| Player 1 |
|
#character-encoding UTF-8
#player1 whatnoloan whatnoloan
#player2 cheramby cheramby
>whatnoloan: EELLMST 8H ELM +10 10
#note TARST Leg 7. This rack looks familiar, like I've had it before in a game I've analyzed, but it doesn't show up when I search my computer for it. Maybe in an ISC game.
>cheramby: GHSSTTU K4 THUGS +24 24
>whatnoloan: ADELLST 7B STALLED +63 73
#note Took me a moment to realize this still played.
>cheramby: AFMPSTW L3 TAMP +31 55
>whatnoloan: CINNOPR 8A PION +28 101
>cheramby: DDEFISW 9C WIFED +31 86
>whatnoloan: ?CGNORZ 6J C.. +13 114
#note Mostly considered COG as an alternative. This can hit some pretty big stuff on column D. Of course it can easily get blocked even if Cherish isn't suspicious of a fish to that line. Not sure I really considered CROZE, which looks pretty good -- I can get some pretty bad draws after CUP. I don't think I considered ORGANIC, either. NZ? might actually be ok after that play. I think I would go with CROZE over ORGANIC -- Quackle seems to think the opposite.
>cheramby: DGINSTV M2 VIG +22 108
>whatnoloan: ?BGNORZ E9 .ORB +18 132
#note I could continue with something like ROB, but I think I'd rather do this.
>cheramby: DNOQRST D6 R...D +9 117
>whatnoloan: ?EFGHNZ F9 .H +28 160
>cheramby: ?ENOQST -Q +0 117
>whatnoloan: ?EFGNTZ 12A ZiNE. +50 210
#note Looked solid after an exchange 1.
>cheramby: ?ENOSTT 13E STENTOr +68 185
>whatnoloan: EFGNRTV B10 GR.VET +26 236
#note Wasn't sure. I could also be more aggressive with FRINGE. The F may be a small positive after GRiVET, though. Quackle actually prefers FRiNGE or FEIGN here, and I think it makes sense. She's actually really unlikely to bingo after FRiNGE (well, even after GRiVET), with this pool, and GRiVET barely decreases her average score compared to FRiNGE. Huh, ok. Feel like I just assessed wrongly here. I think triple triples through the E felt really salient.
>cheramby: ABEIOQR 13A A.O +27 212
>whatnoloan: AEFILNO 14G LOAF +34 270
#note Mainly considered ENFILADE as an alternative. I guess I kind of liked this for blocking and keeping an extra CV with a conso heavy pool. I didn't see FELON at all. Quackle is much preferring those alternatives. I guess the idea is that the board is just really bad for bingos. ENFILADE gives about 2% bingo chance away, so small. Quackle also thinks I score about ten more on my next turn after ENFILADE than after LOAF. Hmmm. I guess because of all the EI left; not particularly good on this board compared to the O, a decent scoring tile.
>cheramby: BDEEIQR 15H BE +30 242
>whatnoloan: CEEINSW 15A E.IC +27 297
#note Like this draw seems pretty amazing to EIN here.
>cheramby: ADEIIQR J8 .AID +9 251
>whatnoloan: EENSUWY 11G WEE.Y +24 321
>cheramby: AEIQRUY G3 QUAR. +24 275
>whatnoloan: KNNOSUU 5E UN.U +8 329
#note Chickened out of UNSUNK (thought: if UNSUNK is good, shouldn't UNSUNKEN be good first? but UNSUNKEN is phony), also considered SOUK. SOUK feels better than UNSUNK because of the X and the possibility of me drawing tuns of vowels. UNAU has the advantage of allowing zero immediate bingos, compared to REINJURE/REINJURY after SOUK / UNSUNK. Spread tradeoff is relevant as well though, not sure what the situation is there.
>cheramby: AEIIIRY H1 REI +20 295
>whatnoloan: AAKNOSX 4D OX +27 356
#note Still no bingos in the pool. Funnily enough, this is actually better statically. I think I was mainly trying not to open RAX, though this does give back RAJ.
>cheramby: AIINORY 1H .AINY +12 307
#note STENTORIAN is cool.
>whatnoloan: AAIJKNS 12K AJI +25 381
#note Quackle appears to get this turn wrong.
>cheramby: EIOOR M9 OOR.E +12 319
>whatnoloan: AKNS N7 SANK +36 417
>whatnoloan: (I) +2 419
|
