Player 1 |
|
#player1 Andre_Popadynec Andre Popadynec
#player2 Joshua_Sokol Joshua Sokol
>Andre_Popadynec: ?EIMNST H2 INMaTES +72 72
>Joshua_Sokol: JNOQRST 2F JO.NT +30 30
>Andre_Popadynec: ACEP G7 PACE +23 95
#note no racks :(
>Joshua_Sokol: ACINQRS J2 .RANQ +34 64
#note totally missed that I still had QA(T) 6F. #visionSAD #findinglarge
>Andre_Popadynec: OY F10 YO +26 121
>Joshua_Sokol: ACEIISW E9 CAW +32 96
>Andre_Popadynec: AI K5 AI +19 140
>Joshua_Sokol: DEGIISU L1 GUIDES +35 131
#note it's almost worth it to keep the S here.
>Andre_Popadynec: AEP 1L .APE +21 161
>Joshua_Sokol: ?IIOORT N1 .OI +10 141
#note Even more aggro quackle likes D11 TORII opening up a 3x3 and giving up 7 more on average than (P)OI #nothankyou
>Andre_Popadynec: BTU D11 TUB +16 177
>Joshua_Sokol: ?EILORT O3 TRIOLEt +73 214
#note TREfOIL #findingsmall
>Andre_Popadynec: AIO F2 .IAO +11 188
>Joshua_Sokol: DIKNOTT E4 KNOT +26 240
#note despite O(KA) KNIT is likely not better than KNOT. Valuation on point again!
>Andre_Popadynec: AEX N9 AXE +27 215
>Joshua_Sokol: ADHIRTU O11 THIRD +41 281
#note Missing DHUTI again #findinglarge #recurringtheme
>Andre_Popadynec: DEEEGLS M9 FERED +47 262
>Andre_Popadynec: DEEEGLS -- -47 215
#note it was at this point that I realize that Andre actually opened horizontally. What are you gonna do about it. The reason I did this is because I thought I opened with INMaTES and only realized a few turns in that it was Andre... The tales of reviewing a more than year-old tournament
>Joshua_Sokol: ABMRSUZ M9 BARMS +43 324
#note M9 SAMBUR even, over H10 SAMBUR, with the inference. And this is a good inference, since his range with FERED is random. Until I figure out what his other two tiles were very quickly #knowledgemedium
>Andre_Popadynec: DEEEFIR 15H REDEFIE. +101 316
#note comic relief but actually wtf I could lose now
>Joshua_Sokol: ILOSUVZ 12K VU. +16 340
#note I know he opened horizontally becuase I remember where he played REDEFIED.
K11 OVUL(E) appears to be a better version of VU(M). It scores the same, blocks more and scores 6 more than VU(M) next turn because D1 plays appear more often. #tacticssmall
>Andre_Popadynec: GU K10 GU. +14 330
>Joshua_Sokol: ILNOSYZ 14D SIZY +42 382
#note Hm, very odd. I guess I felt that I could outrun much better than if I played ZINS? More bingo defense? I think this runs into a lot less trouble than Quackle thinks it does, though I question whether the spread I am losing is worth it. Maybe this was much smarter than I currently think it was.
>Andre_Popadynec: AW F7 AW +17 347
>Joshua_Sokol: EFLNOOR D3 FOOLER +46 428
#note not valid! I could have possibly blown the game here, I need to be careful
>Andre_Popadynec: EGHLLNV N6 HE +28 375
>Joshua_Sokol: DEN 14I DEN +16 444
>Joshua_Sokol: (GLLNV) +18 462
|