Player 1 |
|
#player1 Joshua_Sokol Joshua Sokol
#player2 Leesa_Beerahovich Leesa Beerahovich
>Joshua_Sokol: ?AENOTZ H4 ZONATEd +100 100
>Leesa_Beerahovich: EIILNRS 5F LI.NISER +66 66
>Joshua_Sokol: ?DEGINO 3B mENDIGO +86 186
#note should I make the blank a W? Making it an M increases her options immediately but also encourages plays at 4A to close lines and exhaust the board
>Leesa_Beerahovich: ABEM I7 BEMA +31 97
>Joshua_Sokol: ARSVVWX L4 R.WAX +46 232
#note VAR(I)X might be better since I keep the W for J10 and G7. I don't like 2E AX since it leaves me vulnerable should Leesa decide to gambit and throw a 3x3 or a lucrative hook open. I thought I could just draw an A and play J4 V(I)VA, which doesn't seem to get blocked a ton. I think VAR(I)X is OK but I liked using columns L and M instead of J. #tacticssmall
>Leesa_Beerahovich: ELOT 8K E.TOL +36 133
#note of course this could also happen
>Joshua_Sokol: GSTTUVV N2 VUGS +25 257
#note G7 TUG appeared too vulnerable a play for me, in the same vein as AX last turn.
>Leesa_Beerahovich: GOW J10 WOG +28 161
>Joshua_Sokol: JKLNTTV N7 V.LK +21 278
>Leesa_Beerahovich: DHO K11 HOD +27 188
>Joshua_Sokol: CDJNTTU J2 CUN.T +15 293
#note keeping the J here is fine, I'm trying to clean up my rack in the next two turns, and the J is not too much of an impediment to that since I have the J(U)T spot and many other spots that might appear to me with certain draws or certain of Leesa's plays
>Leesa_Beerahovich: EFIISTU 13K .IF +14 202
#note actual rack, she considered TU(m)IFIES* but thought better of it
>Joshua_Sokol: ADFJRST G7 JAR +48 341
#note yay
>Leesa_Beerahovich: EITU 2B ETUI +17 219
>Joshua_Sokol: CDEFPST 1E DEFT +29 370
#note no 3x3s play after F(UN)D, which makes it an acceptable alternative. I didn't want to take the chance/give Leesa easy ways to dump 1-point tiles for 28+
>Leesa_Beerahovich: EO 4H .O.E. +18 237
>Joshua_Sokol: CEPRRST 3M P.R +10 380
#note Not L12 R(I)P since she likely has the last S at this point. This over C(U)R so that if I bingo on row 14 I won't set up overlaps on row 15.
>Leesa_Beerahovich: AI 4C AI +13 250
>Joshua_Sokol: BCERSTU 12J ..B +20 400
#note oh there are two bingo in here oops I was too confused about BRUCITES
#findingmedium
>Leesa_Beerahovich: EINNOPY 6D POI +11 261
>Joshua_Sokol: CEORSTU E6 .UTSCORE +70 470
#note probably CROUTES/HODS? Didn't know how likely her range was hitting the P in POI. #tacticssmall
>Leesa_Beerahovich: AEY D12 AYE +21 282
#note also now she has this sort of option I shouldn't have allowed.
>Joshua_Sokol: AEHLMQY C12 YEAH +40 510
#note once I actually realized my misplay in this position I assumed YEAH was probably an 18-point mistake. I mistracked a U instead of a D, so I thought my Q had a better chance of not getting stuck. I also didn't notice that INSNARE played under DIF which I was not blocking. So I should play QA(T) 8C and just brace for impact I think.
#tacticsmedium
>Leesa_Beerahovich: ADEINNS 8D I. +3 285
>Joshua_Sokol: AILMQR 8C L.. +3 513
#note LIM(IT) would be the play here but I thought she had a U.
#endgamesmall
>Leesa_Beerahovich: ADENNS C7 E. +3 288
>Joshua_Sokol: AIMQR B7 RAM +11 524
#note thought I was very smart here but she has a D instead of a U so she can block both spots for QI quite easily :(
#endgamesmall
>Leesa_Beerahovich: ADNNS 6A AD +18 306
>Joshua_Sokol: IQ 10N .I +6 530
#note G1 (F)I(G)
>Leesa_Beerahovich: NNS 14B N.. +6 312
>Joshua_Sokol: Q - +0 530
>Leesa_Beerahovich: NS 12C ...N +7 319
>Joshua_Sokol: Q - +0 530
>Leesa_Beerahovich: S J2 .....S +21 340
>Leesa_Beerahovich: (Q) +20 360
|