| Player 1 |
|
#player1 gplnd gplnd
#player2 somewhat_wonderf somewhat wonderf
>gplnd: CDGIISU 8G DUCI +14 14
>somewhat_wonderf: AELLOOS I6 LO.O +8 8
>gplnd: BDEGIST H7 B.G +13 27
>somewhat_wonderf: AEELRSY G8 .ELAYERS +69 77
>gplnd: DEEINST 15E DE.TINES +80 107
>somewhat_wonderf: AEEFPRY 14F F.AP +36 113
>gplnd: EGIOOUZ 12D OOZ. +32 139
>somewhat_wonderf: AEENRRY L8 YEARNER. +80 193
>gplnd: DEGIMSU 13B GUM +16 155
>somewhat_wonderf: DHIMNNR 11B HIND +27 220
>gplnd: ADEIISW J3 WADI +14 169
>somewhat_wonderf: AEGMNRR M10 REAM +26 246
>gplnd: ?CEILST 4G CIT.dELS +70 239
>somewhat_wonderf: GNOPRSX 10A POX +30 276
>gplnd: AEILOUV M1 VOI.A +16 255
>somewhat_wonderf: AAGINRS 1K RA.IN +27 303
>gplnd: EFHLNTU N7 ENUF +29 284
>somewhat_wonderf: AAEEGST O5 GATE +23 326
#note My play up until this point has been almost perfect. Two Y bingos, no less. How can things go downhill? Read on to find out! :)
>gplnd: HIJLRTU A6 THRI. +30 314
#note This is the kinda rack I live for. I make what is the best simming play (or second, depending on how long you let it go).
>somewhat_wonderf: ?AEKOST H3 K. +6 332
#note Pretty cool, huh? :) Now then, the other is KO(RE). I have no idea what Quackle's thinking, but I'm not too concerned with that line of plays.
>gplnd: EIJLOQU 11I QUI.. +28 342
>somewhat_wonderf: ?ABEOST 2B BOATErS +77 409
#note I've hit it, but look at that pool. My worry is if I draw the J (but then I see J(O) and J(ET) and realize I'll be fine. The V should have been a bigger concern.
>gplnd: EJLNOTW 7M N.. +4 346
#note So now then. Should I have fished the B? What else could I have done to avoid this disaster? Has Quackle been fixed (it thinks my bingos are 100% winners). My old version doesn't do rack inferences, and doesn't handle sticks very well.
>somewhat_wonderf: V - +0 409
>gplnd: EJLOTW C1 J. +9 355
>somewhat_wonderf: V - +0 409
>gplnd: ELOTW 3B OWL +44 399
>somewhat_wonderf: V - +0 409
>gplnd: ET D2 ..T +6 405
>somewhat_wonderf: V - +0 409
#note *cry*
>gplnd: E K4 .E +8 413
>gplnd: (V) +8 421
|
