| Player 1 |
|
#player1 Nancy_Bowen Nancy Bowen
#player2 Ryan_Fischer Ryan Fischer
>Nancy_Bowen: EILLTW 8D WILLET +26 26
>Ryan_Fischer: ADEJY - +0 0
#note Lost challenge.
>Nancy_Bowen: IIIII -IIIII +0 26
>Ryan_Fischer: ADEJY H7 D.EJAY +21 21
#note In that ridiculousness, I forgot to write down my leave. Pretty sure this is best, though, with what I had to work with. But if we were always sure of that, we wouldn't need Quackle, now would we?
>Nancy_Bowen: AHHO D8 .HOAH +28 54
#note Wow (er, I mean WHOAH*), this is bogus. That's like a 54+ point swing. It's not even CSW either!
>Ryan_Fischer: INNORUU 11B UN.U +8 29
>Nancy_Bowen: EO 10H .OE +12 66
>Ryan_Fischer: IIKLNOR F6 KI.O +18 47
#note Apprently, KI(L)L, leaving IRON, is better. Whoops. KOI at G11 is better too.
>Nancy_Bowen: CEIR B10 C.RIE +26 92
>Ryan_Fischer: EIILNRW G3 LWEI +14 61
>Nancy_Bowen: ABD A13 BAD +24 116
>Ryan_Fischer: AINPRST 13H SPIRANT +92 153
>Nancy_Bowen: UX 11J XU +27 143
>Ryan_Fischer: ACEGMNR 12L MEAN +26 179
#note CRE(W)MAN. M(A)RC. Just wanted to play some defense here.
>Nancy_Bowen: EEEIN 4G .EENIE +20 163
>Ryan_Fischer: CEFGNOR 5I REF +26 205
#note Defense. FOG is better. Don't know why I passed it up.
>Nancy_Bowen: IOQU O8 QUOI. +42 205
>Ryan_Fischer: ?CGGNOS E3 COGS +21 226
#note Of note: CON(SPIRANT)S for 31.
>Nancy_Bowen: AB C11 .AB +30 235
>Ryan_Fischer: ??GGNOV 4B GOG. +12 238
#note Doesn't rank.
>Nancy_Bowen: DDTY C3 T.DDY +28 263
>Ryan_Fischer: ??ALNTV L1 VAL.TiNg +70 308
#note Of note: uNIVAL(EN)T.
>Nancy_Bowen: AZ 10M AZ. +32 295
>Ryan_Fischer: FINOOSS M2 NOS +22 330
#note O(A)FS for 14. This is bad for a couple reasons.
>Nancy_Bowen: ERTV N1 VERT +34 329
#note That's one of them.
>Ryan_Fischer: AEFIORS H2 RO. +5 335
#note OAF is best, says Champ. 42 and out for these two. My sequence is 5+42, but I don't go out.
>Nancy_Bowen: IMPRT I3 P..M +19 348
>Ryan_Fischer: AEFIS 1E SEIF +42 377
>Nancy_Bowen: IRT B1 TRI. +12 360
>Nancy_Bowen: (A) +2 362
|
